Dne 02. 04. 24 v 10:55 odp. David Foster napsal(a):
Ideally I'd want to register (as a SPDX license) a "public domain determination" text that covers the case of "This
work is in the public domain in the /United States/" (since that's the determination that applies for all the Project
Gutenberg
Thank you for the references Jilayne.
To briefly respond to the points in Dealing with Public Domain within SPDX
Files (
https://github.com/spdx/old-wiki/blob/main/Pages/Legal%20Team/Decisions/Dealing%20with%20Public%20Domain%20within%20SPDX%20Files.md
) :
* 1. The SPDX format already already
Hi all,
Just to take a step back for a minute: requesting some kind of generic
public domain dedication be added to the SPDX License List has come up a
few times. We wrote up this explanation to address this (so we didn't
have to repeat it!). See
On Thu, Mar 28, 2024, 8:26 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 27. 03. 24 v 5:32 odp. David Foster napsal(a):
>
> Since the US copyright term limits encompass those of most other countries
> (which some exceptions below†). I could also see advertising a work as in
> the Public Domain for *all known
Dne 27. 03. 24 v 5:32 odp. David Foster napsal(a):
Since the US copyright term limits encompass those of most other countries (which some exceptions below†). I could
also see advertising a work as in the Public Domain for *all known countries*, which is what the deed for CC Public
Domain Mark
On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 12:24 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
> Dne 26. 03. 24 v 3:27 odp. David Foster napsal(a):
>
>> What SPDX license should I use to mark such a work believed to be in the
>> public domain?
>
> ... public domain in specific country.
Most of the works I'm trying to tag
Dne 26. 03. 24 v 3:27 odp. David Foster napsal(a):
What SPDX license should I use to mark such a work believed to be in the public
domain?
... public domain in specific country.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries%27_copyright_lengths
While US has Life+70years. In Kosovo the
On Tue, Mar 26, 2024, 8:43 PM Richard Fontana wrote:
> Ah that's a good point. I wonder if the language could be tweaked a
> bit to cover the "creative but out of copyright" case, but I'm not
> sure it's worthwhile.
>
> In Fedora's use of SPDX expressions, I think there is no situation
> that
Ah that's a good point. I wonder if the language could be tweaked a
bit to cover the "creative but out of copyright" case, but I'm not
sure it's worthwhile.
In Fedora's use of SPDX expressions, I think there is no situation
that would necessitate an SPDX identifier covering some
out-of-copyright
The proposed license identifier Not-Copyrightable (
https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/issues/2294 ) has the following text:
The material covered by this statement is not creative or original, is
trivial and non-expressive, and is believed to be non-copyrightable
and in the public domain in
I submitted the following issue to add a "license" identifier that
could be used in this situation:
https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/issues/2294
(as a LicenseRef- this is already being used in the Fedora project).
I think the problem with the Public Domain Mark is that it's not a
Let's say I have a work like Mary Shelley's Frankenstein which I believe to be
in the public domain. *What SPDX license should I use to mark such a work
believed to be in the public domain?*
At first I thought CC-PDDC ( Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication and
Certification (
12 matches
Mail list logo
