Re: New License Request: TU-Berlin

2018-04-19 Thread Brad Edmondson 
Hi ARW,

Thank you for these license requests. They have been approved here
 and will be added to
the next release of the SPDX License List.

Best,
Brad

--
Brad Edmondson, *Esq.*
512-673-8782 | brad.edmond...@gmail.com

On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 1:46 PM, Brad Edmondson 
wrote:

> Thanks ARW and Dennis,
>
> Issue for this opened (and you can track progress) here:
> https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/issues/636
>
> The legal team will assess and decide on these licenses there. We have
> just finalized the new licenses for the 3.1 release of the list, so this
> will likely need to wait until the release after that.
>
> Thank you,
> Brad Edmondson
>
>
>
> --
> Brad Edmondson, *Esq.*
> 512-673-8782 | brad.edmond...@gmail.com
>
> On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 12:30 PM, Dennis Clark  wrote:
>
>> Hi Legal Team,
>>
>> For the record, the proposed license is currently recognized by ScanCode
>> as tu-berlin.
>>
>> https://github.com/nexB/scancode-toolkit/blob/4e63a6775a895f
>> dec5a3a53f96013399fa34b1b7/src/licensedcode/data/licenses/tu-berlin.yml
>>
>> Regards,
>> Dennis Clark
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 6:09 PM, A. Wilcox 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Proposed Full Name:
>>>
>>> Technische Universitaet Berlin License
>>>
>>> Permissive Technische Universitaet Berlin License [???]
>>>
>>>
>>> Proposed Short Identifier:
>>>
>>> TU-Berlin-1.0
>>>
>>> TU-Berlin-2.0
>>>
>>>
>>> URL references:
>>>
>>> 1.0:
>>>
>>> http://alpha.tmit.bme.hu/pub/audio/gsm-1.0/copyrigh
>>> https://github.com/swh/ladspa/blob/master/gsm/COPYRIGHT
>>>
>>>
>>> 2.0:
>>>
>>> https://github.com/CorsixTH/deps/blob/master/licences/libgsm.txt
>>> https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu-leb/oneiric/+source/lib
>>> gsm/+copyright
>>>
>>>
>>> OSI-approved?
>>>
>>> No.
>>>
>>>
>>> Packages using this license:
>>>
>>> gsm / libgsm
>>>
>>> via inclusion of gsm code: ladspa, rplay, speex, some builds of vorbis
>>>
>>>
>>> Date:
>>>
>>> 1.0: 15-Sep-1992
>>> 2.0: 05-Apr-2009
>>>
>>>
>>> Explanation (non-normative):
>>>
>>> I did not find any reference to these licenses in the tracking page.  I
>>> have only seen this used in gsm; I do not know if the university has
>>> released other open source projects.  (No further packages were found
>>> searching for key, unique phrases in DuckDuckGo nor Google nor GitHub.)
>>>
>>> Fedora seems to consider this "MIT", but other than some similarities in
>>> 2.0 to MIT/PetSC and MIT/HP, this license has nothing more than a
>>> spiritual relation to MIT in my opinion.
>>>
>>> If this should instead be considered a MIT variant, I would be willing
>>> to resubmit as that.
>>>
>>> Thanks for your consideration.
>>>
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> --arw
>>>
>>> --
>>> A. Wilcox (awilfox)
>>> Project Lead, Adélie Linux
>>> http://adelielinux.org
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Spdx-legal mailing list
>>> Spdx-legal@lists.spdx.org
>>> https://lists.spdx.org/mailman/listinfo/spdx-legal
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ___
>> Spdx-legal mailing list
>> Spdx-legal@lists.spdx.org
>> https://lists.spdx.org/mailman/listinfo/spdx-legal
>>
>>
>
___
Spdx-legal mailing list
Spdx-legal@lists.spdx.org
https://lists.spdx.org/mailman/listinfo/spdx-legal

Re: New License Request: TU-Berlin

2018-04-06 Thread Dennis Clark 
Hi Legal Team,

For the record, the proposed license is currently recognized by ScanCode as
tu-berlin.

https://github.com/nexB/scancode-toolkit/blob/4e63a6775a895fdec5a3a53f96013399fa34b1b7/src/licensedcode/data/licenses/tu-berlin.yml

Regards,
Dennis Clark


On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 6:09 PM, A. Wilcox  wrote:

> Proposed Full Name:
>
> Technische Universitaet Berlin License
>
> Permissive Technische Universitaet Berlin License [???]
>
>
> Proposed Short Identifier:
>
> TU-Berlin-1.0
>
> TU-Berlin-2.0
>
>
> URL references:
>
> 1.0:
>
> http://alpha.tmit.bme.hu/pub/audio/gsm-1.0/copyrigh
> https://github.com/swh/ladspa/blob/master/gsm/COPYRIGHT
>
>
> 2.0:
>
> https://github.com/CorsixTH/deps/blob/master/licences/libgsm.txt
> https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu-leb/oneiric/+source/libgsm/+copyright
>
>
> OSI-approved?
>
> No.
>
>
> Packages using this license:
>
> gsm / libgsm
>
> via inclusion of gsm code: ladspa, rplay, speex, some builds of vorbis
>
>
> Date:
>
> 1.0: 15-Sep-1992
> 2.0: 05-Apr-2009
>
>
> Explanation (non-normative):
>
> I did not find any reference to these licenses in the tracking page.  I
> have only seen this used in gsm; I do not know if the university has
> released other open source projects.  (No further packages were found
> searching for key, unique phrases in DuckDuckGo nor Google nor GitHub.)
>
> Fedora seems to consider this "MIT", but other than some similarities in
> 2.0 to MIT/PetSC and MIT/HP, this license has nothing more than a
> spiritual relation to MIT in my opinion.
>
> If this should instead be considered a MIT variant, I would be willing
> to resubmit as that.
>
> Thanks for your consideration.
>
>
> Best,
> --arw
>
> --
> A. Wilcox (awilfox)
> Project Lead, Adélie Linux
> http://adelielinux.org
>
> ___
> Spdx-legal mailing list
> Spdx-legal@lists.spdx.org
> https://lists.spdx.org/mailman/listinfo/spdx-legal
>
>
___
Spdx-legal mailing list
Spdx-legal@lists.spdx.org
https://lists.spdx.org/mailman/listinfo/spdx-legal

New License Request: TU-Berlin

2018-04-05 Thread A. Wilcox 
Proposed Full Name:

Technische Universitaet Berlin License

Permissive Technische Universitaet Berlin License [???]


Proposed Short Identifier:

TU-Berlin-1.0

TU-Berlin-2.0


URL references:

1.0:

http://alpha.tmit.bme.hu/pub/audio/gsm-1.0/copyrigh
https://github.com/swh/ladspa/blob/master/gsm/COPYRIGHT


2.0:

https://github.com/CorsixTH/deps/blob/master/licences/libgsm.txt
https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu-leb/oneiric/+source/libgsm/+copyright


OSI-approved?

No.


Packages using this license:

gsm / libgsm

via inclusion of gsm code: ladspa, rplay, speex, some builds of vorbis


Date:

1.0: 15-Sep-1992
2.0: 05-Apr-2009


Explanation (non-normative):

I did not find any reference to these licenses in the tracking page.  I
have only seen this used in gsm; I do not know if the university has
released other open source projects.  (No further packages were found
searching for key, unique phrases in DuckDuckGo nor Google nor GitHub.)

Fedora seems to consider this "MIT", but other than some similarities in
2.0 to MIT/PetSC and MIT/HP, this license has nothing more than a
spiritual relation to MIT in my opinion.

If this should instead be considered a MIT variant, I would be willing
to resubmit as that.

Thanks for your consideration.


Best,
--arw

-- 
A. Wilcox (awilfox)
Project Lead, Adélie Linux
http://adelielinux.org
Copyright 1992, 1993, 1994 by Jutta Degener and Carsten Bormann,
Technische Universitaet Berlin

Any use of this software is permitted provided that this notice is not
removed and that neither the authors nor the Technische Universitaet Berlin
are deemed to have made any representations as to the suitability of this
software for any purpose nor are held responsible for any defects of
this software.  THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY FOR THIS SOFTWARE.

As a matter of courtesy, the authors request to be informed about uses
this software has found, about bugs in this software, and about any
improvements that may be of general interest.

Berlin, 28.11.1994
Jutta Degener
Carsten Bormann

 oOo

Since the original terms of 15 years ago maybe do not make our
intentions completely clear given today's refined usage of the legal
terms, we append this additional permission:

  Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this software
  for any purpose with or without fee is hereby granted,
  provided that this notice is not removed and that neither
  the authors nor the Technische Universitaet Berlin are
  deemed to have made any representations as to the suitability
  of this software for any purpose nor are held responsible
  for any defects of this software.  THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NO
  WARRANTY FOR THIS SOFTWARE.

Berkeley/Bremen, 05.04.2009
Jutta Degener
Carsten Bormann
Copyright 1992 by Jutta Degener and Carsten Bormann,
Technische Universitaet Berlin

Any use of this software is permitted provided that this notice is not
removed and that neither the authors nor the Technische Universitaet Berlin
are deemed to have made any representations as to the suitability of this
software for any purpose nor are held responsible for any defects of
this software.  THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY FOR THIS SOFTWARE.

As a matter of courtesy, the authors request to be informed about uses
this software has found, about bugs in this software, and about any
improvements that may be of general interest.

Berlin, 15.09.1992
Jutta Degener
Carsten Bormann


signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Spdx-legal mailing list
Spdx-legal@lists.spdx.org
https://lists.spdx.org/mailman/listinfo/spdx-legal