Hi ARW, Thank you for these license requests. They have been approved here <https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/issues/636> and will be added to the next release of the SPDX License List.
Best, Brad -- Brad Edmondson, *Esq.* 512-673-8782 | brad.edmond...@gmail.com On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 1:46 PM, Brad Edmondson <brad.edmond...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks ARW and Dennis, > > Issue for this opened (and you can track progress) here: > https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/issues/636 > > The legal team will assess and decide on these licenses there. We have > just finalized the new licenses for the 3.1 release of the list, so this > will likely need to wait until the release after that. > > Thank you, > Brad Edmondson > > > > -- > Brad Edmondson, *Esq.* > 512-673-8782 | brad.edmond...@gmail.com > > On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 12:30 PM, Dennis Clark <dmcl...@nexb.com> wrote: > >> Hi Legal Team, >> >> For the record, the proposed license is currently recognized by ScanCode >> as tu-berlin. >> >> https://github.com/nexB/scancode-toolkit/blob/4e63a6775a895f >> dec5a3a53f96013399fa34b1b7/src/licensedcode/data/licenses/tu-berlin.yml >> >> Regards, >> Dennis Clark >> >> >> On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 6:09 PM, A. Wilcox <awil...@adelielinux.org> >> wrote: >> >>> Proposed Full Name: >>> >>> Technische Universitaet Berlin License >>> >>> Permissive Technische Universitaet Berlin License [???] >>> >>> >>> Proposed Short Identifier: >>> >>> TU-Berlin-1.0 >>> >>> TU-Berlin-2.0 >>> >>> >>> URL references: >>> >>> 1.0: >>> >>> http://alpha.tmit.bme.hu/pub/audio/gsm-1.0/copyrigh >>> https://github.com/swh/ladspa/blob/master/gsm/COPYRIGHT >>> >>> >>> 2.0: >>> >>> https://github.com/CorsixTH/deps/blob/master/licences/libgsm.txt >>> https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu-leb/oneiric/+source/lib >>> gsm/+copyright >>> >>> >>> OSI-approved? >>> >>> No. >>> >>> >>> Packages using this license: >>> >>> gsm / libgsm >>> >>> via inclusion of gsm code: ladspa, rplay, speex, some builds of vorbis >>> >>> >>> Date: >>> >>> 1.0: 15-Sep-1992 >>> 2.0: 05-Apr-2009 >>> >>> >>> Explanation (non-normative): >>> >>> I did not find any reference to these licenses in the tracking page. I >>> have only seen this used in gsm; I do not know if the university has >>> released other open source projects. (No further packages were found >>> searching for key, unique phrases in DuckDuckGo nor Google nor GitHub.) >>> >>> Fedora seems to consider this "MIT", but other than some similarities in >>> 2.0 to MIT/PetSC and MIT/HP, this license has nothing more than a >>> spiritual relation to MIT in my opinion. >>> >>> If this should instead be considered a MIT variant, I would be willing >>> to resubmit as that. >>> >>> Thanks for your consideration. >>> >>> >>> Best, >>> --arw >>> >>> -- >>> A. Wilcox (awilfox) >>> Project Lead, Adélie Linux >>> http://adelielinux.org >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Spdx-legal mailing list >>> Spdx-legal@lists.spdx.org >>> https://lists.spdx.org/mailman/listinfo/spdx-legal >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Spdx-legal mailing list >> Spdx-legal@lists.spdx.org >> https://lists.spdx.org/mailman/listinfo/spdx-legal >> >> >
_______________________________________________ Spdx-legal mailing list Spdx-legal@lists.spdx.org https://lists.spdx.org/mailman/listinfo/spdx-legal
