Re: call today

On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 8:51 AM J Lovejoy wrote: > We have our regularly scheduled call today in a bit over an hour from > now. We’ll get back to reviewing issues and prepping for the next release > - as well as any updates on other on-going projects. > I'll give an update on FreeBSD's use of S

Re: Call today

: Spdx-legal@lists.spdx.org On Behalf Of Patrice-Emmanuel SCHMITZ via Lists.Spdx.Org Sent: Friday, August 10, 2018 2:57 AM To: J Lovejoy Cc: Spdx-legal@lists.spdx.org Subject: Re: Call today Dear Jilayne, In July 2018 the FSF updated its free software licenses list and the EUPL-1.2 is now

Re: Call today

Dear Jilayne, In July 2018 the FSF updated its free software licenses list and the EUPL-1.2 is now "officially" listed as "free". https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.en.html#GPLIncompatibleLicenses Could you please u

Re: call today

Jilayne, Sorry for the last minute notice, but I cannot make it to today's meeting due to conlficts. Regards, Dennis On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 8:14 AM, J Lovejoy wrote: > Agenda: > > 1) update on XML (Gary has done some work with tools, lets discuss output > of that, what’s needed, etc.) and revie

Re: call today!

Minutes have been posted. http://wiki.spdx.org/view/Legal_Team/Minutes/2015-03-05 For those who were on the call, please review and let me know if I missed anything!! SPDX Legal Team co-lead opensou...@jilayne.com > On Mar 5, 2015, a

RE: call today!

Property Manager Tel (510) 749-2016 | Fax (510) 749-4552 From: spdx-legal-boun...@lists.spdx.org [mailto:spdx-legal-boun...@lists.spdx.org] On Behalf Of Wheeler, David A Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 9:55 AM To: J Lovejoy; SPDX-legal Subject: RE: call today! I’m glad to see the new

Re: call today!

I'm unavailable today. In client meetings in Scottsdale. Have a good meeting. * * * * * * * * * * * * Thomas H. Vidal, Esq. Abrams Garfinkel Margolis Bergson, LLP 5900 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 2250 Los Angeles, CA 90036 Direct Dial: 310.300.2950 | Facsimile:310.300.2901 tvi...@agmblaw.com

RE: call today!

I’m glad to see the new expression syntax, including “+”, “with”, “and”, “or”, and “;”. Big improvement. However, I suggest NOT requiring that expressions be surrounded with parentheses when there is no ambiguity (e.g., a single list of “and” or “or” at the top level). All the examples http: