RE: Request for consideration of AX 2.0 Working Group Charter Proposal

The InfoCard community adopted this approach not because it was preferred, but because no standard syntax for attaching verification attributes to individual SAML claims had been agreed upon by that time. I hope that we can rectify that shortfall sometime soon.

PAPE Approved as an OpenID Specification

As announced on OpenID.net, PAPE has been approved by the OpenID Foundation membership as an OpenID specification. This is significant both because it completes the development of the first specification under the OpenID I

RE: Request for consideration of Working Group Charter Proposal

To be clear, once this proposal has stopped changing, the proposers will need to send a version in an e-mail message to the specs list asking that the working group be created. The reason it needs to be in e-mail rather than on the wiki is that the archived version of the e-mail won't change, w

Member Vote to Approve the PAPE Specification

As announced at http://openid.net/2008/12/22/member-vote-to-approve-the-pape-specification/, the member vote to approve the PAPE specification as an OpenID standard is now under way. Visit https://openid.net/foundation/members/polls/2 to vote between now and December 29th. If approved, this w

Request for consideration of AX 2.0 Working Group Charter Proposal

Can you add a clear statement to the draft charter that implementations already using AX 1.0 will remain compatible with the output of this working group? Or is backwards-compatibility with existing AX implementations not a goal of this work? -- Mike -Origi

Proposal to form Discovery Working Group

Can you add a clear statement to the draft charter that implementations already using Yadis will remain compatible with the output of this working group, since, as I understand it, XRDS-Simple is intended to be compatible with Yadis? Or is backwards-compatibility with existing OpenID 2.0 implem

RE: [OpenID board] Please process the WG proposals on the table (WAS The Specs Council and Process)

I have to agree with Nat. The real problem here, as I see it, is that the current specs council members appear to be reluctant to actually fulfill their duties for timely review of specification proposals. David or Scott, can you please create the (publicly readable) specs-coun...@openid.net

RE: Joining OpenID Spec List

No non-assert is required to participate in the specs list (and of course, consequently, no IPR assumptions should be made by participants about any content sent there). IPR pledges *are* required to participate in working group lists, so that the IPR status of all contributions there are clear

RE: PAPE Specification Review Period Commencing

g duplicate messages). -- Mike From: Paul Madsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2008 6:19 AM To: Mike Jones Cc: specs@openid.net; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: PAPE Specification Review Period Commencing Hi Mike, if there were an official l

PAPE Specification Review Period Commencing

The OpenID Provider Authentication Policy Extension (PAPE) Working Group recommends approval of PAPE Draft 7 as an OpenID Specification. The draft is available at these locations: http://openid.net/specs/openid-provider-authentication-policy-extension-1_0-07.html http://openid.net/specs/openid-p

RE: [OpenID board] The Specifications Council

oth create a separation between the board of > the OIDF and the community technical working groups and to provide > guidance as future OpenID specifications are being developed. We've > thus unanimously elected the following individuals to the council to > serve the initial term

Notice of vote on the proposal to create the PAPE working group

In accordance with the OpenID Foundation IPR policies and procedures, this message notifies OpenID Foundation members that a vote that will be held on the creation of the PAPE working group between noon Friday, June 6th US Pacific Time and no

RE: Proposal to create the PAPE working group

orrow. -- Mike -Original Message- From: Nat Sakimura [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2008 5:55 PM To: Mike Jones Cc: specs@openid.net Subject: Re: Proposal to create the PAPE working group Perhaps you could explain to the list what the process wi

RE: Proposal to create the PAPE working group

This message is being sent to revise the proposal to create the PAPE working group, changing only one word, so that the projected completion date is July 2008, rather than May 2008. The complete text of the revised proposal follows. --

RE: Proposal to create the PAPE working group

TECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Sxip Identity Corporation -- Mike ____ From: Mike Jones Sent: Friday, April 25, 2008 1:36 PM To: specs@openid.net Cc: David Recordon; Ben Laurie; Drummond Reed; John Bradley; J

Proposal to create the PAPE working group

In accordance with the OpenID Foundation IPR policies and procedures this note proposes the formation of a new working group chartered to produce an OpenID specification. As per Section 4.1 of the Policies, the specifics of the proposed work