RE: Making identities persistent?

2006-11-01 Thread Recordon, David
Pete, While the transaction with the IdP is about the derived identifier (sort of like that term actually), the RP uses the delegated identifier when referencing the user. --David -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pete Rowley Sent: Wednesda

Re: "Editors" Conference Call

2006-11-01 Thread Dick Hardt
On 1-Nov-06, at 12:28 PM, John Kemp wrote: > OK. Just checking. So an IdP/OP can choose whether or not to trust a > particular RP, based on some out-of-ban criteria. And an RP can choose > whether or not to trust the assertions of a particular IdP/OP? OK > good. Technically possible, yes for th

Re: "Editors" Conference Call

2006-11-01 Thread John Kemp
Dick Hardt wrote: >> It would be nice to see a clear definition of an OP in order to >> determine the exact differences between such an entity and an IdP, but, >> in the absence of such, some questions: >> >> Dick Hardt wrote: >>> Thanks David! ;-) >>> >>> Patrick, as you point out, Identity Provi

Re: "Editors" Conference Call

2006-11-01 Thread Dick Hardt
On 1-Nov-06, at 11:33 AM, John Kemp wrote: > Hi Dick, Hi John! > > It would be nice to see a clear definition of an OP in order to > determine the exact differences between such an entity and an IdP, > but, > in the absence of such, some questions: > > Dick Hardt wrote: >> Thanks David! ;-) >

Re: "Editors" Conference Call

2006-11-01 Thread John Kemp
Hi Dick, It would be nice to see a clear definition of an OP in order to determine the exact differences between such an entity and an IdP, but, in the absence of such, some questions: Dick Hardt wrote: > Thanks David! ;-) > > Patrick, as you point out, Identity Provider is a well understood >

RE: Making identities persistent?

2006-11-01 Thread Hallam-Baker, Phillip
I'm afraid I still don't get it. As far as I am concerned the authenticated identifier is the tuple: (Identity-provider-Id, Identifier) If we want to have a single identifier there has to be a mechanism for establishing the scope of authority for each IdP over a specific subset of identifi

Re: Making identities persistent?

2006-11-01 Thread Pete Rowley
Rowan Kerr wrote: On Wed, 2006-11-01 at 11:33 -0500, John Kemp wrote: I think you need the ability for a user to change his identifier at the RP (as George notes below) and also at the IdP. Isn't this was already covered in the spec? You accomplish this by creating an HTML page on som

Re: "Editors" Conference Call

2006-11-01 Thread Dick Hardt
Thanks David! ;-) Patrick, as you point out, Identity Provider is a well understood term in SAML and WS-*. Here is the definition from SAML 2.0 [1] Identity Provider: A kind of service provider that creates, maintains, and manages identity information for principals and provides principal aut

RE: Making identities persistent?

2006-11-01 Thread Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Don't forget that the a more important constraint here is to prevent impersonation. I don't see how one can switch between genuinely autonamous IdPs in the way suggested without allowing a rogue IdP to impersonate anyone they chose. At what point do the synchronization mechanisms you build in e

Re: Making identities persistent?

2006-11-01 Thread Rowan Kerr
On Wed, 2006-11-01 at 11:33 -0500, John Kemp wrote: > I think you need the ability for a user to change his identifier at the > RP (as George notes below) and also at the IdP. Isn't this was already covered in the spec? You accomplish this by creating an HTML page on some website you control with

Re: Making identities persistent?

2006-11-01 Thread John Kemp
Hello, I think you need the ability for a user to change his identifier at the RP (as George notes below) and also at the IdP. In addition, it should be possible for the IdP to providing OpenID "forwarding" if the user leaves for another IdP (perhaps the user will even pay for a forwarding service

RE: Making identities persistent?

2006-11-01 Thread Hallam-Baker, Phillip
If we want identities to be persistent then we are going to need to introduce a layer of indirection. This normally gets me worried about patents and such. Fortunately Multics did this, so did UNIX and VMS. Plenty of prior art. If we are serious about decentralization then map the user identi

Re: Making identities persistent?

2006-11-01 Thread Stefan Görling
The reasons for raising this question was partly that I've been doing some research on how people use e-mail addresses and sad to say, you can not expect the user to make wise choices. And even so, companies go broke even the best ones. Services comes and disappear. In my research over half of

RE: Making identities persistent?

2006-11-01 Thread Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Bad statement of the principle. Centralized direction is inevitable if there are to be unique, mnemonic identifiers.   The questions are whether the centralized control is accountable, whether the system has checks and balances and the confidence that users can place in the registry continui