On 10/17/06, Dick Hardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think we should be open (pun intended) to making changes.
>
> I really like the OpenID Provider -> shortens to OP, and is very
> specific on what it does.
> I have always found IdP to be a misnomer, and have mentioned it in
> the past.
> Now we
I think we should be open (pun intended) to making changes.
I really like the OpenID Provider -> shortens to OP, and is very
specific on what it does.
I have always found IdP to be a misnomer, and have mentioned it in
the past.
Now we have a great candidate, that provides more clarity, and it
I'd really prefer not to change terminology in the spec right now.
Seems like something we should have thought about four months ago versus
a week after we said it would be final. There is nothing saying user
friendly terms that map to spec terms can't be created for the time
being. I do however
