[speedtouch] Fwd: [Speedtouch 330 rev4] Please Martin can you help me a little?

2004-04-14 Thread Martin Galpin
Dear Jérôme, I haven't tested it, but I'm confident it's ok. http://www.nemohackers.org/speedtouch_mandrake.php Regards, Martin Galpin -- Forwarded Message -- Subject: [Speedtouch 330 rev4] Please Martin can you help me a little? Date: Wednesday 14 April 2004 19:25 From

[speedtouch] Re: Modem connection gradually gets slower.

2004-04-04 Thread Martin Galpin
On Sunday 04 April 2004 16:12, Leonard den Ottolander wrote: Hello Sergio, then gradually I have been getting problems with Firefox and Thunderbird not being able to type into the location bar without freezing the browser. Care to explain how that could be related to the speedtouch

[speedtouch] Re: [RFC] 330 rev4 support

2004-02-15 Thread Martin Galpin
On Sunday 15 February 2004 12:50 am, Edouard Gomez wrote: On  my  side,  i've   already  completed  the  new  firmware  extraction code/API. For  legal reasons i'm  going to remove the  proprietary data1 source. I'm also going to provide  the free version in a standalone file that   will  

[speedtouch] Re: 330/Rev 400 success

2004-02-11 Thread Martin Galpin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ok i threw the main ideas, now i must find the time to code it correctly. Cry and shout loud on this ML if i did nothing until the end of the week. Sounds good to me. Don't think that was a dig, I totally understand if you don't have

[speedtouch] Re: 330/Rev 400 success

2004-02-10 Thread Martin Galpin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday 10 February 2004 11:08 pm, Leonard den Ottolander wrote: Hello Martin, Sort of. I think the original source doesn't use all the spaces but tabs instead. Could you be so kind to upload a cleanly patching diff instead of a hand

[speedtouch] Re: 330/Rev 400 success

2004-02-10 Thread Martin Galpin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday 11 February 2004 12:18 am, Leonard den Ottolander wrote: Hi Martin, Also the second block uses spaces instead of tabs, 8 or 9 spaces alternatingly. I am fixing that as well. A clean patch will be available within 24 hours from

[speedtouch] Re: problem with driver - see config.log

2004-02-09 Thread Martin Galpin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 The problem is nothing to do with the drivers. As config.log reports, you're missing `as', which is the GNU assembler. Reinstall/compile GCC and it's dependencies. Regards, Martin -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

[speedtouch] Re: 330/Rev 400 success

2004-02-09 Thread Martin Galpin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Monday 09 February 2004 09:59 pm, Leonard den Ottolander wrote: Hello Martin, I finally got my own patch to work today! So, I'm free once again. http://www.nemohackers.org/speedtouch.php If I apply this patch to modem_run will it still

[speedtouch] Re: 330/Rev 400 success

2004-02-09 Thread Martin Galpin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ok i threw the main ideas, now i must find the time to code it correctly. Cry and shout loud on this ML if i did nothing until the end of the week. Sounds good to me. Don't think that was a dig, I totally understand if you don't have

[speedtouch] Re: 330/Rev 400 success

2004-02-08 Thread Martin Galpin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sunday 08 February 2004 03:37 pm, Leonard den Ottolander wrote: Hello Martin, I finally got my own patch to work today! So, I'm free once again. Great! Thanks for putting in your effort. http://www.nemohackers.org/speedtouch.php The

[speedtouch] Re: help needed with testing auto-detect Rev patch

2004-02-08 Thread Martin Galpin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sunday 08 February 2004 09:48 am, John Hysted wrote: I have produced a patch for modem_run which should auto-detect the modem revision and execute the appropriate code for Rev , 0200 and 0400 modems, but as I only have a green frog I am

[speedtouch] Re: 330/Rev 400 success

2004-02-08 Thread Martin Galpin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sunday 08 February 2004 04:24 pm, Leonard den Ottolander wrote: Hello Martin, http://www.nemohackers.org/speedtouch.php The patch available there seems to be mangled. So it does. I apoligise for that, I think gFTP messed up

[speedtouch] 330/Rev 400 success

2004-02-07 Thread Martin Galpin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I finally got my own patch to work today! So, I'm free once again. I'd like to thank you all. Until a real fix is made, I wrote a short page for new users on how to get the Rev 400 modem to work. http://www.nemohackers.org/speedtouch.php (if I

[speedtouch] Re: 330/Rev 400 (silver modem) - Got it working!

2004-01-29 Thread Martin Galpin
This didn't do it for me. Could you maybe run a diff against your source, or archive yours? Could you also confirm to me you're using the ZZZLP2.eni firmware? Martin On Wednesday 28 January 2004 11:39 am, Remigio Di Muzio wrote: I've got a Speetouch 330/Rev 400 (silver modem) too and I've

[speedtouch] Re: News about the Silver modems

2004-01-29 Thread Martin Galpin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday 30 January 2004 12:08 am, Edouard Gomez wrote: Hi, It's now a few weeks a new model of the speedtouch usb is shiped. However as some of few have noticed, the current drivers are simply not adapted to this new series

[speedtouch] Re: silver modem

2004-01-23 Thread Martin Galpin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday 23 January 2004 08:14 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I have just got a silver modem and I'm unable to get it working with Gentoo. I have read on this list there seems to be issues with the firmware uploading (and I'd agree with this

[speedtouch] Re: Speedtouch 330 V4.00

2004-01-01 Thread Martin Galpin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Status update: Earlier I updated to ARM code in modem_run.c to that in the log for the new firmware, as well as updating what I thought were the start/end points in extract.c. The modem failed to initialise, so I imagine I got the end point

[speedtouch] Re: Speedtouch 330 V4.00

2003-12-31 Thread Martin Galpin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Liste de diffusion modem ALCATEL SpeedTouch USB Pour se désinscrire : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Dear Duncan, Sorry highlighted the wrong bit of code should have been 0x0c. I am unsure how to do what you are suggesting. Any suggestions?

[speedtouch] Re: Speedtouch 330 V4.00

2003-12-31 Thread Martin Galpin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday 31 December 2003 01:36 pm, you wrote: Dear Martin, I take it you have a windows machine so you can use usb-snoopy to get the log file? Otherwise I can send you mine. Regards Mike Dear Mike, Yeah, I've had to run the modem on

[speedtouch] Re: Speedtouch 330 V4.00

2003-12-31 Thread Martin Galpin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday 31 December 2003 01:36 pm, you wrote: Dear Martin, I take it you have a windows machine so you can use usb-snoopy to get the log file? Otherwise I can send you mine. Regards Mike Change of plan, ICS causes the resources on

[speedtouch] Re: firmware loader problem

2003-12-29 Thread Martin Galpin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 i downloaded version 1.2-beta3 and it worked! But this wasn't with a Rev 4.00 was it? - -- Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments. See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version:

[speedtouch] Re: Silver SpeedTouch 330 Modem

2003-12-27 Thread Martin Galpin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Saturday 27 December 2003 09:48 am, you wrote: Things getting more obscure by the day. I already mentioned getting two firmware-files named 'ZZZLP2.eni', probably for the version 4 type of modem. The funny thing is, that they TOO are of

[speedtouch] Re: Silver SpeedTouch 330 Modem

2003-12-26 Thread Martin Galpin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday 26 December 2003 12:28 pm, you wrote: Hello, I have seen in the mailing list other people are having problems with the Silver 330 Rev 4.0 modem. I am having the same problem that the firmware will not upload! I have finally come to

[speedtouch] Re: Silver SpeedTouch 330 Modem

2003-12-26 Thread Martin Galpin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday 26 December 2003 09:31 pm, you wrote: Ok Overbeek (mz) wrote: Could any of you (Mike?Martin?) send me this infamous V4 firmware-file please (on my private address). I'm a collector... Ok O. In the meantime I received a

[speedtouch] Fwd: Re: Silver SpeedTouch 330 Modem

2003-12-26 Thread Martin Galpin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 - -- Forwarded Message -- Subject: Re: Silver SpeedTouch 330 Modem Date: Friday 26 December 2003 09:44 pm From: Michael Eccleston [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * From: Martin Galpin * Subject: [speedtouch] Re

[speedtouch] Re: Joy !!! (Was Re: Re: Further info : Alcatel Speedtouch 330 USB/ Linux kernel 2.4.20, speedbundle 1.0, gcc 3.3)

2003-12-25 Thread Martin Galpin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Congratulations. Let me just confirm one thing -- you don't have a Rev: 4.00 do you? Have a good christmas, Martin - -- Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments. See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html -BEGIN

[speedtouch] Re: Driver V1.2beta3 report

2003-12-25 Thread Martin Galpin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 25 December 2003 02:38 pm, you wrote: - default timout of 30s is a bit to short for me since I am on an Alcatel DSLM (60s is large and OK for me) there is 2 new firmwares on the R3.0 windows driver CRC:0x698eb734, Size:761389 for

[speedtouch] Re: Further info : Alcatel Speedtouch 330 USB/ Linux kernel 2.4.20, speedbundle 1.0, gcc 3.3

2003-12-25 Thread Martin Galpin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 No, your line type is one of : - a classical analogic line (pots: plain old telephon system) and use ADSL ANSI/G.dtm annex A - a numeric line (isdn: integrated services numeric line) and use ADSL ANSI/G.dtm annex B ( and UR2 for Germany). Over

[speedtouch] Re: Further info : Alcatel Speedtouch 330 USB/ Linux kernel 2.4.20, speedbundle 1.0, gcc 3.3

2003-12-24 Thread Martin Galpin
from someone Regards of the season :) Lesley On Wed, 24 Dec 2003 13:23:27 -0800, Martin Galpin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I just received a new SpeedTouch 330 on warrenty (and to my supprise it's silver -- could this be an updated version?). Anyway, since I received it I've had

[speedtouch] Re: Further info : Alcatel Speedtouch 330 USB/ Linux kernel 2.4.20, speedbundle 1.0, gcc 3.3

2003-12-24 Thread Martin Galpin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Well, as I'm using the userspace drivers, I wont recompile my kernel. I have another box that I have tried the kernelspace and probed the speectch module -- however, I'm not sure if it registered properly. That's all water under the bridge though,

[speedtouch] Re: Further info : Alcatel Speedtouch 330 USB/ Linux kernel 2.4.20, speedbundle 1.0, gcc 3.3

2003-12-24 Thread Martin Galpin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Your modem run under windows with wich version of the driver? Is your ADSL line over ISDN? Maybe I am right but it was just a quick look at the windows V3 driver. I completly don't know what is done inside. I just see a new model REV 4.00

[speedtouch] Re: Further info : Alcatel Speedtouch 330 USB/ Linux kernel 2.4.20, speedbundle 1.0, gcc 3.3

2003-12-24 Thread Martin Galpin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 All installed in the kernel. Just need to get the firmware sorted out. Lesley As do I... Does anyone sucessfully use a rev 4.00 330? Martin - -- Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments. See

[speedtouch] Re: Further info : Alcatel Speedtouch 330 USB/ Linux kernel 2.4.20, speedbundle 1.0, gcc 3.3

2003-12-24 Thread Martin Galpin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I really don't know if this is going to help I am downloading VMWAre (25 M via 56k dial up wail !!!) then i am going to try and get the alcaudsl sorted from there. VMware does a 30 day trial ( www.vmware.com ) Lesley That would probably work

[speedtouch] Re: Further info : Alcatel Speedtouch 330 USB/ Linux kernel 2.4.20, speedbundle 1.0, gcc 3.3

2003-12-24 Thread Martin Galpin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 25 December 2003 03:20 am, you wrote: Martin On Thu, 25 Dec 2003 01:33:34 +, Martin Galpin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That would probably work but I would rather not have to emulate the firware -- I would still have