[speedtouch] Re: 330/Rev 400 success

2004-02-11 Thread Martin Galpin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > Ok i threw the main ideas, now i must find the time to code it > correctly. Cry and shout loud on this ML if i did nothing until the end > of the week. Sounds good to me. Don't think that was a dig, I totally understand if you don't hav

[speedtouch] Re: 330/Rev 400 success

2004-02-10 Thread Leonard den Ottolander
Hello Martin, > The patch is perfectly clean for me. > > Either way, to finish this now, I'll upload your patch. > > I am the author of the patch, though what was originally uploaded was sent to > me by Remigio Di Muzio (without him realising I was the author). > http://www.nemohackers.org/

[speedtouch] Re: 330/Rev 400 success

2004-02-10 Thread Martin Galpin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday 11 February 2004 12:18 am, Leonard den Ottolander wrote: > Hi Martin, > > > > Also the second block uses spaces instead of tabs, 8 or 9 spaces > > > alternatingly. I am fixing that as well. A clean patch will be > > > available within 24

[speedtouch] Re: 330/Rev 400 success

2004-02-10 Thread Leonard den Ottolander
Hi Martin, > > Also the second block uses spaces instead of tabs, 8 or 9 spaces > > alternatingly. I am fixing that as well. A clean patch will be available > > within 24 hours from > > http://www.ottolander.nl/opensource/speedtouch/modem_run.c.diff . My version is available. Created by diffing

[speedtouch] Re: 330/Rev 400 success

2004-02-10 Thread Martin Galpin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday 10 February 2004 11:08 pm, Leonard den Ottolander wrote: > Hello Martin, > > > Sort of. I think the original source doesn't use all the spaces but tabs > > instead. Could you be so kind to upload a cleanly patching diff instead > > of a han

[speedtouch] Re: 330/Rev 400 success

2004-02-10 Thread Leonard den Ottolander
Hello Martin, > Sort of. I think the original source doesn't use all the spaces but tabs > instead. Could you be so kind to upload a cleanly patching diff instead > of a hand crafted version? > > diff -u modem_run.c.000 modem_run.c > > I think in general it is good for maintenance if indention

[speedtouch] Re: 330/Rev 400 success

2004-02-10 Thread Leonard den Ottolander
Hello Martin, > > still appears mangled. Sorry :( . > > It's fixed now! Sort of. I think the original source doesn't use all the spaces but tabs instead. Could you be so kind to upload a cleanly patching diff instead of a hand crafted version? diff -u modem_run.c.000 modem_run.c I think in ge

[speedtouch] Re: 330/Rev 400 success

2004-02-09 Thread Edouard Gomez
Martin Galpin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Out of interest, do Thomson notify you of the changes, or do they rely > on the community to reverse engineer it? I get the impression that for > a product which sports a "Supported in GNU/Linux" they don't do much > to help it. Since the first 330 is

[speedtouch] Re: 330/Rev 400 success

2004-02-09 Thread Martin Galpin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > Ok i threw the main ideas, now i must find the time to code it > correctly. Cry and shout loud on this ML if i did nothing until the end > of the week. Sounds good to me. Don't think that was a dig, I totally understand if you don't have

[speedtouch] Re: 330/Rev 400 success

2004-02-09 Thread Edouard Gomez
Martin Galpin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Until a real fix is made, I wrote a short page for new users on how to > get the Rev 400 modem to work. This mail is just posted to show i'm not ignoring this nice thread and that i'm porting attention to it. It's just i have not so much time left

[speedtouch] Re: 330/Rev 400 success

2004-02-09 Thread Martin Galpin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Monday 09 February 2004 09:59 pm, Leonard den Ottolander wrote: > Hello Martin, > > > I finally got my own patch to work today! So, I'm free once again. > > > > http://www.nemohackers.org/speedtouch.php > > If I apply this patch to modem_run will i

[speedtouch] Re: 330/Rev 400 success

2004-02-09 Thread Leonard den Ottolander
Hello Martin, > I finally got my own patch to work today! So, I'm free once again. > http://www.nemohackers.org/speedtouch.php If I apply this patch to modem_run will it still work with the original 330? If so did you add it to CVS? If not, how do you expect to merge it? An extra command line s

[speedtouch] Re: 330/Rev 400 success

2004-02-08 Thread Martin Galpin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sunday 08 February 2004 04:24 pm, Leonard den Ottolander wrote: > Hello Martin, > > > > > http://www.nemohackers.org/speedtouch.php > > > > > > The patch available there seems to be mangled. > > > > So it does. I apoligise for that, I think gFTP me

[speedtouch] Re: 330/Rev 400 success

2004-02-08 Thread Leonard den Ottolander
Hello Martin, > > > http://www.nemohackers.org/speedtouch.php > > > > The patch available there seems to be mangled. > So it does. I apoligise for that, I think gFTP messed up alittle. > > It's fixed now. http://www.nemohackers.org/speedtouch/ : modem_run.diff 08-Feb-2004 10:4219

[speedtouch] Re: 330/Rev 400 success

2004-02-08 Thread Martin Galpin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sunday 08 February 2004 03:37 pm, Leonard den Ottolander wrote: > Hello Martin, > > > I finally got my own patch to work today! So, I'm free once again. > > Great! Thanks for putting in your effort. > > > http://www.nemohackers.org/speedtouch.php >

[speedtouch] Re: 330/Rev 400 success

2004-02-08 Thread Leonard den Ottolander
Hello Martin, > I finally got my own patch to work today! So, I'm free once again. Great! Thanks for putting in your effort. > http://www.nemohackers.org/speedtouch.php The patch available there seems to be mangled. Bye, Leonard. -- mount -t life -o ro /dev/dna /genetic/research Liste de