[speedtouch] Re: 330/Rev 400 success
Hello Martin, still appears mangled. Sorry :( . It's fixed now! Sort of. I think the original source doesn't use all the spaces but tabs instead. Could you be so kind to upload a cleanly patching diff instead of a hand crafted version? diff -u modem_run.c.000 modem_run.c I think in general it is good for maintenance if indention is preserved carefully. Tell your editor to use 8 space tabs instead of 8 spaces. If you are using the midnight commander disable the fake half tabs. Bye, Leonard. -- mount -t life -o ro /dev/dna /genetic/research Liste de diffusion modem ALCATEL SpeedTouch USB Pour se désinscrire : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[speedtouch] Re: 330/Rev 400 success
Hello Martin, Sort of. I think the original source doesn't use all the spaces but tabs instead. Could you be so kind to upload a cleanly patching diff instead of a hand crafted version? diff -u modem_run.c.000 modem_run.c I think in general it is good for maintenance if indention is preserved carefully. Tell your editor to use 8 space tabs instead of 8 spaces. If you are using the midnight commander disable the fake half tabs. Got the tarball. The problem appears to be some spaces at the end of some lines that are not taken into account in your hand patch. (Maybe only in my version of the source and already fixed in CVS. If the original diff patches cleanly for you please let me know.) Please do a diff the next time, as it avoids these kind of nasty problems. Also the second block uses spaces instead of tabs, 8 or 9 spaces alternatingly. I am fixing that as well. A clean patch will be available within 24 hours from http://www.ottolander.nl/opensource/speedtouch/modem_run.c.diff . Bye, Leonard. -- mount -t life -o ro /dev/dna /genetic/research Liste de diffusion modem ALCATEL SpeedTouch USB Pour se désinscrire : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[speedtouch] Re: 330/Rev 400 success
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday 10 February 2004 11:08 pm, Leonard den Ottolander wrote: Hello Martin, Sort of. I think the original source doesn't use all the spaces but tabs instead. Could you be so kind to upload a cleanly patching diff instead of a hand crafted version? diff -u modem_run.c.000 modem_run.c I think in general it is good for maintenance if indention is preserved carefully. Tell your editor to use 8 space tabs instead of 8 spaces. If you are using the midnight commander disable the fake half tabs. Got the tarball. The problem appears to be some spaces at the end of some lines that are not taken into account in your hand patch. (Maybe only in my version of the source and already fixed in CVS. If the original diff patches cleanly for you please let me know.) Please do a diff the next time, as it avoids these kind of nasty problems. Also the second block uses spaces instead of tabs, 8 or 9 spaces alternatingly. I am fixing that as well. A clean patch will be available within 24 hours from http://www.ottolander.nl/opensource/speedtouch/modem_run.c.diff . Bye, Leonard. I've uploaded a fresh diff now. I apoligise for this, the patch I had uploaded was what I had been sent, I didn't recreate it. Hopefully it's alright now. Regards, Martin - -- Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments. See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAKW9L3bF34WXq1XsRAv1QAKD2XVvYOSDfZO0/0mtNaMULCt6cfQCgmFRn 2j+aEZECZUjIGwhJu8QVN6A= =1Wt2 -END PGP SIGNATURE- Liste de diffusion modem ALCATEL SpeedTouch USB Pour se désinscrire : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[speedtouch] Re: 330/Rev 400 success
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday 11 February 2004 12:18 am, Leonard den Ottolander wrote: Hi Martin, Also the second block uses spaces instead of tabs, 8 or 9 spaces alternatingly. I am fixing that as well. A clean patch will be available within 24 hours from http://www.ottolander.nl/opensource/speedtouch/modem_run.c.diff . My version is available. Created by diffing the tarball against the old tarball and cleaning up the spacing. I've uploaded a fresh diff now. I apoligise for this, the patch I had uploaded was what I had been sent, I didn't recreate it. Sent by whom? Who is the creator of that patch? Does that patch patch cleanly for you (patch -p 0 modem_run.diff)? Maybe the offending spaces have been deleted from CVS, in which case I am mistaken. The patch is perfectly clean for me. Either way, to finish this now, I'll upload your patch. I am the author of the patch, though what was originally uploaded was sent to me by Remigio Di Muzio (without him realising I was the author). http://www.nemohackers.org/speedtouch/modem_run.diff is now your diff. Martin - -- Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments. See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAKXcR3bF34WXq1XsRAtzmAKDc7MwxbNb2vCmoSyFzQ3MbJIQUMQCgyWJW /ppB2CJ0aHxrM7pkRnmlBBw= =9jKF -END PGP SIGNATURE- Liste de diffusion modem ALCATEL SpeedTouch USB Pour se désinscrire : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[speedtouch] Re: 330/Rev 400 success
Hello Martin, The patch is perfectly clean for me. Either way, to finish this now, I'll upload your patch. I am the author of the patch, though what was originally uploaded was sent to me by Remigio Di Muzio (without him realising I was the author). g http://www.nemohackers.org/speedtouch/modem_run.diff is now your diff. Now you are moving to fast ;) . If the patch you got patches cleanly against CVS mine won't. The first hunk fixes two redundant spaces at the end of the lines. It is needed for the tarball that I distribute inside my rpm, but not necessarily valid against current CVS. So if you have problems using this version the first hunk can safely be dropped. The spacing of the last block is nicer however. Bye, Leonard. -- mount -t life -o ro /dev/dna /genetic/research Liste de diffusion modem ALCATEL SpeedTouch USB Pour se désinscrire : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[speedtouch] USB device 2 (vend/prod 0x6b9/0x4061) is not claimed by any active driver.
Hi, SpeedTouch behaves properly under WinXP, but switching to RedHat i get the following messages: usb.c: USB device 2 (vend/prod 0x6b9/0x4061) is not claimed by any active driver. ... Feb 8 16:38:33 aaz-home /etc/hotplug/usb.agent: ... no modules for USB product 6b9/4061/200 ... Feb 10 12:59:58 aaz-home modprobe: modprobe: Can't locate module tty-l disc-13 /proc/bus/usb/devices shows: ... P: Vendor=06b9 ProdID=4061 Rev= 2.00 S: Manufacturer=ALCATEL S: Product=Speed Touch 330 S: SerialNumber=0090D09AF030 C:* #Ifs= 3 Cfg#= 1 Atr=80 MxPwr=500mA I: If#= 0 Alt= 0 #EPs= 1 Cls=ff(vend.) Sub=00 Prot=00 Driver=(none) E: Ad=81(I) Atr=03(Int.) MxPS= 16 Ivl=50ms I: If#= 1 Alt= 0 #EPs= 0 Cls=ff(vend.) Sub=00 Prot=00 Driver=(none) I: If#= 1 Alt= 1 #EPs= 3 Cls=ff(vend.) Sub=00 Prot=00 Driver=(none) E: Ad=06(O) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS= 64 Ivl=0ms E: Ad=07(O) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS= 64 Ivl=0ms E: Ad=87(I) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS= 64 Ivl=0ms ... dmesg shows: ehci-hcd 00:1d.7: USB 2.0 enabled, EHCI 1.00, driver 2003-Jan-22 hub.c: USB hub found hub.c: 6 ports detected usb.c: registered new driver hiddev usb.c: registered new driver hid hid-core.c: v1.8.1 Andreas Gal, Vojtech Pavlik [EMAIL PROTECTED] hid-core.c: USB HID support drivers mice: PS/2 mouse device common for all mice IA-32 Microcode Update Driver: v1.11 [EMAIL PROTECTED] microcode: CPU0 no microcode found! (sig=f27, pflags=4) ... usb_control/bulk_msg: timeout usbdevfs: USBDEVFS_BULK failed dev 2 ep 0x85 len 512 ret -110 CSLIP: code copyright 1989 Regents of the University of California PPP generic driver version 2.4.2 divert: not allocating divert_blk for non-ethernet device ppp0 divert: no divert_blk to free, ppp0 not ethernet i also noticed, that usbserial kernel module is not automaticely loaded. usb.usermap seems to be set properly. btw. i'v got this (hardware, software and a detailed instruction) from the telekom offering it's standard Internet DSL access with it. I installed speedtouch-1.2-beta1.tgz , speedmgmt.tgz and hotplug-2002_08_26.tgz as they say. Could somebody explain me, please what these messages: 1. device not claimed by any driver 2. no modules for USB product 3. no microcode found 4. usbdevfs failed actually mean. Does a kernel module not exist ? I compiled with: # USB support CONFIG_USB=m CONFIG_USB_LONG_TIMEOUT=y # CONFIG_USB_LARGE_CONFIG is not set # Miscellaneous USB options CONFIG_USB_DEVICEFS=y # CONFIG_USB_BANDWIDTH is not set # USB Controllers CONFIG_USB_UHCI=m CONFIG_USB_UHCI_ALT=m CONFIG_USB_OHCI=m CONFIG_USB_EHCI_HCD=m # USB Device Class drivers - all of them # USB Human Interface Devices (HID) - all beside mouse and kbd # CONFIG_USB_MOUSE is not set - but USB mous is working properly !!! # USB Network adaptors - all # USB port drivers CONFIG_USB_USS720=m # USB Serial Converter support CONFIG_USB_SERIAL=m # CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_DEBUG is not set CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_GENERIC=y and all others beside: # CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_KEYSPAN_USA28 is not set # CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_KEYSPAN_USA28X is not set # CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_KEYSPAN_USA19 is not set # CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_KEYSPAN_USA18X is not set # USB misc drivers - all best, zbyszek -- http://zbyszek.evot.org Liste de diffusion modem ALCATEL SpeedTouch USB Pour se dsinscrire : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[speedtouch] Re: USB device 2 (vend/prod 0x6b9/0x4061) is not claimed by any active driver.
Hi Gilles, thank you for your answere, still some questions. On ro 11. of February 2004 07:48, Gilles wrote: I installed speedtouch-1.2-beta1.tgz , speedmgmt.tgz and hotplug-2002_08_26.tgz as they say. 1. device not claimed by any driver this is related how kernel and hotplug complain because you don't have a module but no need with V1.2beta1 2. no modules for USB product the module is a different driver of V1.2beta1 user mode program and it need a pppd with pppoatm.so or (pppoe.so|rp-pppoe.so) plugins do you mean i can ignore both those messages ? 4. usbdevfs failed have you ever read once the FAQ/how-to (of the user mode and the kernel mode program)? yes, i did. As i understand usbdevfs is pure information for some programs and i don't need it for SpeedTouch to work, but I thought publishing the error message might throw some light on the cause of my problem Does a kernel module not exist ? I compiled with: yes it is include in kernel from 2.4.22 and later I have 2.4.20-24.9, but you mean no need for this module with V2.2beta1 at all, yes ? best, zbyszek -- http://zbyszek.evot.org Liste de diffusion modem ALCATEL SpeedTouch USB Pour se dsinscrire : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
