Re: Class name manipulation in autodoc

2009-05-24 Thread Matthew Turk
Hi Pauli, I think this idea is promising. I think for now I will take a look at Doug's idea of using a preprocessor, as that might be easier to get started, but this coming weekend I'll dig into this. Looking at the autodoc sources, this could be a relatively easy addition, particularly if it

Re: Class name manipulation in autodoc

2009-05-24 Thread Georg Brandl
Matthew Turk schrieb: Hi there, Just as an upfront, I'm loving using sphinx to document a project. I'm writing because I'm stuck at a particular usage pattern we have in our code, and how to properly document it. We have objects that have affiliated derived quantities -- to get at these

Re: Class name manipulation in autodoc

2009-05-20 Thread Doug Hellmann
On May 19, 2009, at 11:12 PM, Matthew Turk wrote: Hi there, Just as an upfront, I'm loving using sphinx to document a project. I'm writing because I'm stuck at a particular usage pattern we have in our code, and how to properly document it. We have objects that have affiliated derived

Re: Class name manipulation in autodoc

2009-05-20 Thread Pauli Virtanen
Hi, Tue, 19 May 2009 20:12:38 -0700, Matthew Turk kirjoitti: [clip] identically to how the autodoc extension would work -- rather than autodocing the underlying class itself, which is not meant to be accessed directly. Is there a way to supply an override to the displayed name (in addition