Am Mittwoch, 9. Mai 2012, 10:56:17 schrieb Mark Brown:
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 03:34:50AM +0530, Thomas Abraham wrote:
+ s3c64xx_spi0_set_platdata(s3c6410-spi, NULL, 0, 1);
Shouldn't we just set the name in the struct platform_device rather than
requiring the machine to pass it through by
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 03:34:50AM +0530, Thomas Abraham wrote:
+ s3c64xx_spi0_set_platdata(s3c6410-spi, NULL, 0, 1);
Shouldn't we just set the name in the struct platform_device rather than
requiring the machine to pass it through by hand?
On 9 May 2012 22:33, Mark Brown broo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com wrote:
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 10:22:26PM +0800, Thomas Abraham wrote:
On 9 May 2012 18:55, Mark Brown broo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com wrote:
Yes, that's the normal way of handling this and is actually what the
code was
With the spi controller hardware configuration moved into the driver data, there
are no more default hardware configuration data that is passed through platform
data. Accordingly, the s3c64xx_spi{0|1|2}_set_platdata functions are adapted to
these changes.
Cc: Jaswinder Singh
