>
> I'm a little bit confused. This appears to be the third patch series
> that is designated "v4". That means this should actually be v6, no?
> (although the previous series was sent exactly 1 minute before this
> one, so maybe they're the same?)
>
Yes, did some mistakes preparing and sending
I'm a little bit confused. This appears to be the third patch series
that is designated "v4". That means this should actually be v6, no?
(although the previous series was sent exactly 1 minute before this
one, so maybe they're the same?)
On Thu, 2016-12-01 at 11:24 +, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
These objects were used by the sound channel as
this channel read/write to/from client directly.
This make the code of this channel quite different
from the other ones.
Also this reduce code duplication from RedChannelClient
and increase encapsulation.
First set of patches attempt to rename
These objects were used by the sound channel as
this channel read/write to/from client directly.
This make the code of this channel quite different
from the other ones.
Also this reduce code duplication from RedChannelClient
and increase encapsulation.
First set of patches attempt to rename
