Hi WG,
Trust everyone is doing well.
Authors have updated the SR PM draft for TWAMP (RFC 5357) and moved the
STAMP (now RFC 8762) extensions into a separate draft, as the SR PM
extensions are for two different RFCs and protocols. This was also a
feedback from the WG.
Name:
Chris,
please see inline:
On 23/03/2020 17:39, Chris Bowers wrote:
Peter,
The proposed SRv6 SID Structure Sub-Sub-TLV has several problems.
1) As discussed in item#3 below, it is not clear that flooding LB
Length, LN Length, Fun. Length, and Arg. Length to all ISIS speakers is
really the
Thomas, here's some feedback about draft-tgraf-ipfix-mpls-sr-label-type-01 :
Since Figure 1 is intended to update the "IPFIX Information Element #46"
SubRegistry, it should contain the same columns as that registry - ie,
Value, Description, Reference.
The ElementID, Abstract Data Type, and