Re: [spring] [mpls] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths

o have gotten out of hand. Why not just agree that you original statement of "increased by up to 3x" was an exaggeration? Cheers, Adrian > -Original Message- > From: Zafar Ali (zali) [mailto:z...@cisco.com<mailto:z...@cisco.com>] > Sent: 20 November 2017 23:36 &

Re: [spring] [mpls] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths

re achieved through an expansion of a Binding SID are just part of the >> landscape and (of course) thy have to be coped with. The draft doesn't >> introduce sub-paths, it just observes that they exist. >> >> Lastly, the conversation on the number of labels as a multiplier see

Re: [spring] [mpls] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths

raft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths<draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-pa...@ietf.org<mailto:draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-pa...@ietf.org>>;mpls<m...@ietf.org<mailto:m...@ietf.org>>;spring<spring@ietf.org<mailto:spring@ietf.org>

Re: [spring] [mpls] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths

dr...@olddog.co.uk<mailto:adr...@olddog.co.uk> > Cc: 'spring'; 'mpls' > Subject: Re: [mpls] [spring] Special purpose labels in > draft-hegde-spring-traffic- > accounting-for-sr-paths > > Hi Adrian, > > Some comments are provided in-line. > > Please note that, we

Re: [spring] [mpls] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths

citele.com>>; draft-ietf-spring-oam-usec...@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-spring-oam-usec...@ietf.org>; xuxia...@huawei.com<mailto:xuxia...@huawei.com>; z...@cisco.com<mailto:z...@cisco.com>; gregimir...@gmail.com<mailto:gregimir...@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [spr

Re: [spring] [mpls] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths

are achieved through an expansion of a Binding SID are just part of the >> landscape and (of course) thy have to be coped with. The draft doesn't >> introduce sub-paths, it just observes that they exist. >> >> Lastly, the conversation on the number of labels as a multiplier see

Re: [spring] [mpls] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths

xpansion of a Binding SID are just part of the >>> landscape and (of course) thy have to be coped with. The draft doesn't >>> introduce sub-paths, it just observes that they exist. >>> >>> Lastly, the conversation on the number of labels as a multiplier seem

Re: [spring] [mpls] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths

23:36 > To: adr...@olddog.co.uk <mailto:adr...@olddog.co.uk> > Cc: 'spring'; 'mpls' > Subject: Re: [mpls] [spring] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic- > accounting-for-sr-paths > > Hi Adrian, > > Some comments are prov

Re: [spring] [mpls] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths

Comments inline: On 20/11/2017 23:36, Zafar Ali (zali) wrote: Hi Adrian, Some comments are provided in-line. Please note that, we all want to let this lingering tread die and follow-up on the next steps noted during this email exchange. I will be happy to have a webEx call and discuss it

Re: [spring] [mpls] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths

r...@olddog.co.uk" <adr...@olddog.co.uk> Cc: "Zafar Ali (zali)" <z...@cisco.com>, "m...@ietf.org" <m...@ietf.org>, spring <spring@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [spring] [mpls] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths Hi Adr

Re: [spring] [mpls] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths

of hand. Why not just agree that you original statement of > "increased by up to 3x" was an exaggeration? > > Cheers, > Adrian > > > -Original Message----- > > From: Zafar Ali (zali) [mailto:z...@cisco.com] > > Sent: 20 November 2017 23:36 > > To: adr

Re: [spring] [mpls] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths

z...@cisco.com] > Sent: 20 November 2017 23:36 > To: adr...@olddog.co.uk > Cc: 'spring'; 'mpls' > Subject: Re: [mpls] [spring] Special purpose labels in > draft-hegde-spring-traffic- > accounting-for-sr-paths > > Hi Adrian, > > Some comments are provided in-line. > >

Re: [spring] [mpls] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths

@ietf.org" <m...@ietf.org>, spring <spring@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [mpls] [spring] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths Hi Zafar, "overloading existing special label"? AFAIK, MPLS WG created Extended Special Label exactly for ca

Re: [spring] [mpls] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths

2017 at 7:03 PM > *To: *"Zafar Ali (zali)" <z...@cisco.com> > *Cc: *"adr...@olddog.co.uk" <adr...@olddog.co.uk>, "m...@ietf.org" < > m...@ietf.org>, spring <spring@ietf.org> > *Subject: *Re: [mpls] [spring] Special purpose labels in &

Re: [spring] [mpls] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths

From: Greg Mirsky <gregimir...@gmail.com> Date: Monday, November 20, 2017 at 7:03 PM To: "Zafar Ali (zali)" <z...@cisco.com> Cc: "adr...@olddog.co.uk" <adr...@olddog.co.uk>, "m...@ietf.org" <m...@ietf.org>, spring <spring@ietf.org> S

Re: [spring] [mpls] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths

Hi Zafar, I don't see how managing, using passive OAM, i.e. counting fly-by packets, at transient SR-MPLS nodes can be equated to breaking "no-forwarding state at transient LSR" model.I believe that practical is as important as aesthetic and that network cannot be operated without comprehensive

Re: [spring] [mpls] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths

sr-pa...@ietf.org>, spring <spring@ietf.org>, "m...@ietf.org" <m...@ietf.org> Subject: RE: [spring] [mpls] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths Hi, Comments inline Yours Irrespectively, John From: spring [mailto:spring-bo

Re: [spring] [mpls] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths

Hi Adrian, Some comments are provided in-line. Please note that, we all want to let this lingering tread die and follow-up on the next steps noted during this email exchange. I will be happy to have a webEx call and discuss it further, offline. Thanks Regards … Zafar On 11/18/17, 9:08

Re: [spring] [mpls] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths

) *Subject:* Re: [mpls] [spring] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths I would like to ask a fundamental question here. Do we need transit counters for only MPLS-SR, or do we need it for MPLS-LDP as well? If we need it for both, then we need to have

Re: [spring] [mpls] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths

; Cc: mpls; spring; Clarence Filsfils; >> draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths; Michael Gorokhovsky; >> draft-ietf-spring-oam-usec...@ietf.org; Zafar Ali (zali) >> Subject: Re: [mpls] [spring] Special purpose labels in >> draft-hegde-spring-traffic-account

Re: [spring] [mpls] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths

g-traffic-accounting-for-sr-pa...@ietf.org>; spring <spring@ietf.org>; mpls <m...@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [spring] [mpls] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths Hi John, Sorry for delay in the response; I was away from the emails. Please see in-line.

Re: [spring] [mpls] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths

Thanks for helping me break my resolution to leave this thread alone :-( >>> procedure (in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths) that >>> breaks SR >>> Architecture, highly unscalable and complicated to implement. >> >> [JD] Do you have any evidence to justify any of your

Re: [spring] [mpls] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths

Ali (zali) *Subject:* Re: [mpls] [spring] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths Hi, Yes today we do not have any CLI command on any router to get paths statistics for LDP (I mean Ingress to Egress) as LDP is based on MP2P LSPs, so a transit node does

Re: [spring] [mpls] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths

mpls; spring; Clarence Filsfils; > draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths; > Michael Gorokhovsky; draft-ietf-spring-oam-usec...@ietf.org; Zafar Ali > (zali) > *Subject:* Re: [mpls] [spring] Special purpose labels in > draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths > >

Re: [spring] [mpls] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths

ccounting-for-sr-paths <draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-pa...@ietf.org>; Michael Gorokhovsky <michael.gorokhov...@ecitele.com>; draft-ietf-spring-oam-usec...@ietf.org; Zafar Ali (zali) <z...@cisco.com> Subject: Re: [mpls] [spring] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde

Re: [spring] [mpls] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths

..@ietf.org>] *On > Behalf Of *stephane.litkow...@orange.com > *Sent:* Thursday, November 16, 2017 6:49 PM > *To:* Robert Raszuk; Alexander Vainshtein > *Cc:* mpls; spring; Clarence Filsfils; > draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths; > Michael Gorokhovsky; draft

Re: [spring] [mpls] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths

; Zafar Ali (zali) Subject: Re: [mpls] [spring] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths Hi, Yes today we do not have any CLI command on any router to get paths statistics for LDP (I mean Ingress to Egress) as LDP is based on MP2P LSPs, so a transit node d

Re: [spring] [mpls] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths

.org <mpls-boun...@ietf.org>] *On > Behalf Of *stephane.litkow...@orange.com > *Sent:* Thursday, November 16, 2017 6:49 PM > *To:* Robert Raszuk; Alexander Vainshtein > *Cc:* mpls; spring; Clarence Filsfils; > draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths; > Michael Gorok

Re: [spring] [mpls] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths

regimir...@gmail.com> Cc: draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths <draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-pa...@ietf.org>, spring <spring@ietf.org>, mpls <m...@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [mpls] [spring] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-acc

Re: [spring] [mpls] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths

Filsfils; mpls; Michael Gorokhovsky; draft-ietf-spring-oam-usec...@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-spring-oam-usec...@ietf.org>; draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths; Zafar Ali (zali) Subject: Re: [mpls] [spring] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr

Re: [spring] [mpls] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths

-spring-oam-usec...@ietf.org; Zafar Ali (zali) Subject: Re: [mpls] [spring] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths Hi, Yes today we do not have any CLI command on any router to get paths statistics for LDP (I mean Ingress to Egress) as LDP is based on MP2P

Re: [spring] [mpls] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths

> Hi, > > > > We are dealing with an SR network in which the data plane is MPLS rather > than IP. > > > > Yours Irrespectively, > > > > John > ​I think this is very important to stop here for a moment and discuss ... What is MPLS data plane ? MPLS data plane can be connection less (constructed

Re: [spring] [mpls] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths

spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths <draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-pa...@ietf.org>; spring <spring@ietf.org>; mpls <m...@ietf.org>; Zafar Ali (zali) <z...@cisco.com> Subject: Re: [mpls] [spring] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-acco

Re: [spring] [mpls] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths

for-sr-paths <draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-pa...@ietf.org>; spring <spring@ietf.org>; mpls <m...@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [mpls] [spring] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths Hi Folks, I also agree that it’s not a que

Re: [spring] [mpls] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths

.com>; draft-ietf-spring-oam-usec...@ietf.org; Zafar Ali (zali) <z...@cisco.com> Subject: RE: [mpls] [spring] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths Sasha, We did not use the term SR-TE LSP in our draft and I think it is misleading. I sugges

Re: [spring] [mpls] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths

..@ietf.org>; Michael Gorokhovsky <michael.gorokhov...@ecitele.com>; draft-ietf-spring-oam-usec...@ietf.org; Zafar Ali (zali) <z...@cisco.com> Subject: Re: [mpls] [spring] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths Greg, I concur with your position: le

Re: [spring] [mpls] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths

ing@ietf.org>>;mpls<m...@ietf.org<mailto:m...@ietf.org>>;Zafar Ali (zali)<z...@cisco.com<mailto:z...@cisco.com>>;Greg Mirsky<gregimir...@gmail.com<mailto:gregimir...@gmail.com>> 主题： Re: [spring] [mpls] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-acco

Re: [spring] [mpls] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths

@ecitele.com>; draft-ietf-spring-oam-usec...@ietf.org; draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths <draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-pa...@ietf.org>; Zafar Ali (zali) <z...@cisco.com> Subject: RE: [mpls] [spring] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traff

Re: [spring] [mpls] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths

Zafar Ali (zali) <z...@cisco.com>; mpls <m...@ietf.org>; > Xuxiaohu <xuxia...@huawei.com>; Michael Gorokhovsky < > michael.gorokhov...@ecitele.com>; draft-ietf-spring-oam-usec...@ietf.org > *Subject:* Re: [mpls] [spring] Special purpose labels in > draft-hegde-sp

Re: [spring] [mpls] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths

..@cisco.com; gregimir...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [spring] [mpls] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths Sasha, the purpose of the SR OAM Use Case is to illustrate how Segment Routing enables new ways to perform OAM tasks. Like delay measurements. What is discussed

Re: [spring] [mpls] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths

michael.gorokhov...@ecitele.com>; draft-ietf-spring-oam-usec...@ietf.org Subject: Re: [mpls] [spring] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths Hi Sasha, many thanks. I'd point to SR OAM Requirements<https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-spring-sr-oam-requi

Re: [spring] [mpls] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths

ei.com> > *Cc:* draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths < > draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-pa...@ietf.org>; spring < > spring@ietf.org>; Zafar Ali (zali) <z...@cisco.com>; mpls <m...@ietf.org> > *Subject:* Re: [mpls] [spring] Special purpo

Re: [spring] [mpls] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths

lto:spring@ietf.org>>; Zafar Ali (zali) <z...@cisco.com<mailto:z...@cisco.com>>; mpls <m...@ietf.org<mailto:m...@ietf.org>> Subject: Re: [mpls] [spring] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths Dear All, I cannot imagine that operato

Re: [spring] [mpls] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths

*Cc:* draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths < > draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-pa...@ietf.org>; spring < > spring@ietf.org>; Zafar Ali (zali) <z...@cisco.com>; mpls <m...@ietf.org> > *Subject:* Re: [mpls] [spring] Special purpose labels in >

Re: [spring] [mpls] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths

etf.org; Zafar Ali (zali) <z...@cisco.com>; Clarence Filsfils <cfils...@cisco.com> Subject: Re: [mpls] [spring] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths Folks, This thread started and the requirements reported clearly stated that all what we need is t

Re: [spring] [mpls] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths

徐小虎 Xuxiaohu > M：+86-13910161692 > E：xuxia...@huawei.com > 产品与解决方案-网络战略与业务发展部 > Products & Solutions-Network Strategy & Business Development Dept > > *发件人：* Greg Mirsky > > *收件人：* Xuxiaohu<xuxia...@huawei.com> > > *抄送：* Zafar Ali (zali)<z...@cisco.com&

Re: [spring] [mpls] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths

r-paths <draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-pa...@ietf.org>, "m...@ietf.org" <m...@ietf.org>, spring <spring@ietf.org> Subject: RE: [mpls] [spring] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths I fully agree with you that

Re: [spring] [mpls] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths

-for-sr-pa...@ietf.org>; spring < spring@ietf.org>; Zafar Ali (zali) <z...@cisco.com>; mpls <m...@ietf.org> *Subject:* Re: [mpls] [spring] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths Dear All, I cannot imagine that operators will agree

Re: [spring] [mpls] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths

...@ietf.org>; spring <spring@ietf.org>; Zafar Ali (zali) <z...@cisco.com>; mpls <m...@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [mpls] [spring] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths Dear All, I cannot imagine that operators will agree to deploy network

Re: [spring] [mpls] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths

gt; *抄送： *draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-pa...@ietf.org>;spring< > spring@ietf.org>;mpls<m...@ietf.org>;Zafar Ali (zali)<z...@cisco.com>;Greg > Mirsky<gregimir...@gmail.com> > *主题： *Re: [spring] [

Re: [spring] [mpls] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths

.@ietf.org>>;Zafar Ali (zali)<z...@cisco.com<mailto:z...@cisco.com>>;Greg Mirsky<gregimir...@gmail.com<mailto:gregimir...@gmail.com>> 主题： Re: [spring] [mpls] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths 时间： 2017-11-16 14:25:32 s/p

Re: [spring] [mpls] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths

c-accounting-for-sr-pa...@ietf.org>>;Greg Mirsky<gregimir...@gmail.com<mailto:gregimir...@gmail.com>>;spring<spring@ietf.org<mailto:spring@ietf.org>>;Zafar Ali (zali)<z...@cisco.com<mailto:z...@cisco.com>>;mpls<m...@ietf.org<mailto:m...@ietf.org>&g

Re: [spring] [mpls] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths

hs <draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-pa...@ietf.org> Subject: RE: [spring] [mpls] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths If so, why not directly use RSVP-TE if the per flow state is needed? 徐小虎 Xuxiaohu M：+86-13910161692 E：xuxia...@

Re: [spring] [mpls] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths

pring@ietf.org>; Greg Mirsky <gregimir...@gmail.com>; mpls <m...@ietf.org>; Xuxiaohu <xuxia...@huawei.com>; Zafar Ali (zali) <z...@cisco.com> Subject: Re: [spring] [mpls] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths Robert, If we have

Re: [spring] [mpls] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths

ing <spring@ietf.org>, mpls <m...@ietf.org>, "Zafar Ali (zali)" <z...@cisco.com>, draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths <draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-pa...@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [spring] [mpls] Special purpose labels in draft-hegd

Re: [spring] [mpls] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths

, November 16, 2017 11:09 AM To: Robert Raszuk Cc: draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths; spring; Greg Mirsky; mpls; Xuxiaohu; Zafar Ali (zali) Subject: Re: [spring] [mpls] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths Today, if you run RSVP-TE, you’d get

Re: [spring] [mpls] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths

Xuxiaohu <xuxia...@huawei.com>; Zafar Ali (zali) <z...@cisco.com> Subject: Re: [spring] [mpls] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths Today, if you run RSVP-TE, you’d get (at least on high end platforms) counters per LSP. Having the same functiona

Re: [spring] [mpls] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths

com>; draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths <draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-pa...@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [spring] [mpls] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths As explained it is not needed to get all information required per pa

Re: [spring] [mpls] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths

sr-paths <draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-pa...@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [spring] [mpls] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths As explained it is not needed to get all information required per path. Yes you may have N:1 mapping of flows to

Re: [spring] [mpls] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths

lt;mailto:m...@ietf.org>>;spring<spring@ietf.org<mailto:spring@ietf.org>> 主题： Re: [mpls] [spring] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths 时间： 2017-11-16 10:27:55 Dear All, I cannot imagine that operators will agree to deploy network that lac

Re: [spring] [mpls] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths

xiaohu <xuxia...@huawei.com> > *Cc: *Greg Mirsky <gregimir...@gmail.com>, spring <spring@ietf.org>, mpls > <m...@ietf.org>, "Zafar Ali (zali)" <z...@cisco.com>, > draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths < > draft-hegde-spring-traffic-ac

Re: [spring] [mpls] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths

ucts & Solutions-Network Strategy & Business Development Dept >> >> *发件人： *Zafar Ali (zali) >> *收件人： *Greg Mirsky<gregimir...@gmail.com>;draft-hegde-spring-traffic-acc >> ounting-for-sr-paths> or-sr-pa...@ietf.org>;mpls<m...@ietf.org>;spring<sprin

Re: [spring] [mpls] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths

spring <spring@ietf.org>, mpls <m...@ietf.org>, "Zafar Ali (zali)" <z...@cisco.com>, draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths <draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-pa...@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [spring] [mpls] Special purpose lab

Re: [spring] [mpls] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths

y<gregimir...@gmail.com>;draft-hegde-spring-traffic-acc >> ounting-for-sr-paths> for-sr-pa...@ietf.org>;mpls<m...@ietf.org>;spring<spring@ietf.org> >> *主题： *Re: [mpls] [spring] Special purpose labels in >> draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths >&g

Re: [spring] [mpls] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths

etwork Strategy & Business Development Dept >> >> *发件人： *Zafar Ali (zali) >> *收件人： *Greg Mirsky<gregimir...@gmail.com>;draft-hegde-spring-traffic-acc >> ounting-for-sr-paths> for-sr-pa...@ietf.org>;mpls<m...@ietf.org>;spring<spring@ietf.org> &

Re: [spring] [mpls] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths

Dept > > *发件人： *Zafar Ali (zali) > *收件人： *Greg Mirsky<gregimir...@gmail.com>;draft-hegde-spring-traffic- > accounting-for-sr-paths accounting-for-sr-pa...@ietf.org>;mpls<m...@ietf.org>;spring< > spring@ietf.org> > *主题： *Re: [mpls] [spring] Special purp

Re: [spring] [mpls] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths

make some compromise. >>>> >>>> Best regards, >>>> Xiaohu >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ---------- >>>> 徐小虎 Xuxiaohu >>>> M：+86-13910161692 >>>> E：xuxia...@h

Re: [spring] [mpls] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths

aohu >>> M：+86-13910161692 >>> E：xuxia...@huawei.com >>> 产品与解决方案-网络战略与业务发展部 >>> Products & Solutions-Network Strategy & Business Development Dept >>> >>> *发件人： *Zafar Ali (zali) >>> *收件人： *Greg Mirsky<gregimir...@gmail.com>;draft

Re: [spring] [mpls] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths

@huawei.com >> 产品与解决方案-网络战略与业务发展部 >> Products & Solutions-Network Strategy & Business Development Dept >> >> *发件人： *Zafar Ali (zali) >> *收件人： *Greg Mirsky<gregimir...@gmail.com>;draft-hegde-spring-traffic-acc >> ounting-for-sr-paths> for-sr-pa...@ietf.org

Re: [spring] [mpls] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths

tf.org>;mpls<m...@ietf.org>;spring< > spring@ietf.org> > *主题： *Re: [mpls] [spring] Special purpose labels in > draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths > *时间： *2017-11-16 02:24:10 > > Hi, > > > > This draft breaks the SR architecture. I am quoting

Re: [spring] [mpls] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths

-for-sr-paths<draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-pa...@ietf.org<mailto:draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-pa...@ietf.org>>;mpls<m...@ietf.org<mailto:m...@ietf.org>>;spring<spring@ietf.org<mailto:spring@ietf.org>> 主题： Re: [mpls] [spring] Special p

Re: [spring] [mpls] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths

Zafar I don’t think you can assert that fails to comply with the SR arch. There is nothing they are doing that cannot be captured in Netflix/IPFIX and SR needs to work with IPFIX. Stewart > On 16 Nov 2017, at 2:23 am, Zafar Ali (zali) wrote: > > Hi, > > This draft breaks