[Sprinklerforum] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Hydraulic Calculations for CPVC - Tees - Straight-through Flow

2022-12-12 Thread Kyle . Montgomery
Thank you guys. That answers it. From: J H Sent: Monday, December 12, 2022 9:02 AM To: Discussion list on issues relating to automatic fire sprinklers Subject: [EXTERNAL] [Sprinklerforum] Re: Hydraulic Calculations for CPVC - Tees - Straight-through Flow A little more clarification to

[Sprinklerforum] Re: Hydraulic Calculations for CPVC - Tees - Straight-through Flow

2022-12-12 Thread J H
A little more clarification to Taylor's response: It's only req'd for a 13D system IF you're using the simplified calculation method using only the static pressure. 13D then points you to their charts for friction loss which includes CPVC tees on the run. If you're calculating a 13D system using

[Sprinklerforum] Re: Hydraulic Calculations for CPVC - Tees - Straight-through Flow

2022-12-12 Thread Taylor Schumacher
Kyle, those lengths are to be used for 13D calculations. They're allowed omissions per NFPA 13 2016 23.4.4.8.1 (3). Taylor Schumacher, ET From: Kyle.Montgomery Sent: Monday, December 12, 2022 9:29 AM To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org Subject: [Sprinklerforum] Hydraulic Calculations

[Sprinklerforum] Hydraulic Calculations for CPVC - Tees - Straight-through Flow

2022-12-12 Thread Kyle . Montgomery
NFPA 13 clearly states that "fitting loss for straight-through flow in a tee or cross shall not be included". But some of the manufacturer's data for CPVC products specifically lists equivalent lengths for these fittings (tee on the run) as well as for couplings. So, are those equivalent