[Sprinklerforum] Re: pipes Hydrostatic test in NFPA 2001: Clean Agents vs Dirty Agents

2023-03-28 Thread BRUCE VERHEI
What has posterity ever done for me? > On 03/28/2023 2:27 AM å... wrote: > > > > Whoever conned or bribed the NFPA and FMGlobal into allowing the name > 'clean agent' to be used for fluorinated gas suppression systems got away > with murder. > > And while they are stable,

[Sprinklerforum] Re: [EXTERNAL] pipes Hydrostatic test in NFPA 2001: Clean Agents vs Dirty Agents

2023-03-28 Thread Kyle . Montgomery
I bet with 80% confidence that there are more unwanted activations in areas protected by 'Dirty Agents' than there are fire saves' by 'Dirty Agent' fire suppression systems. Probably true of water-based fire suppression too though, right? -Kyle M From: å... Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2023

[Sprinklerforum] pipes Hydrostatic test in NFPA 2001: Clean Agents vs Dirty Agents

2023-03-28 Thread å . . . . . . .
Whoever conned or bribed the NFPA and FMGlobal into allowing the name 'clean agent' to be used for fluorinated gas suppression systems got away with murder. And while they are stable, until they are not (i.e. decompose in the fire or after some time short of 'forever'...) Many of these fluorinat