Subject: RE: [Sprinklerforum] Re: Modified 13D System per FD
I am not sure, but I don’t believe I’ve ever seen rules related to wagering on
the forum. I do not believe it would be appropriate however, in the unlikely
event of “off-track” betting on the outcome of a code application, the house
ruary 21, 2024 6:52 AM
To: 'Discussion list on issues relating to automatic fire sprinklers'
; 'Steve Leyton'
Subject: [Sprinklerforum] Re: Modified 13D System per FD
I am not sure, but I don’t believe I’ve ever seen rules related to wagering on
the forum. I do not believe it would be app
: [Sprinklerforum] Re: Modified 13D System per FD
Caution: This email originated from outside your organization. Please take care
when clicking links or opening attachments.
As I keep trying to beat into people’s brains, Codes are a minimum. If the
project is not design-build, then you need to look to see
>
>
>
>
>
> AutoSPRINK|AutoSPRINK FAB|AutoSPRINK RVT|AlarmCAD
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: bcap...@firesprinkler.org
> Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2024 6:52 AM
> To: 'Discussion list on issue
nklers'
; 'Steve Leyton'
Subject: [Sprinklerforum] Re: Modified 13D System per FD
I am not sure, but I don’t believe I’ve ever seen rules related to wagering on
the forum. I do not believe it would be appropriate however, in the unlikely
event of “off-track” betting on the outcome of a code appli
2024 2:54 AM
To: Discussion list on issues relating to automatic fire sprinklers
; Steve Leyton
Subject: [Sprinklerforum] Re: Modified 13D System per FD
Unfortunately I assume we can’t arrange wagers on this forum. I’d give odds
Steve L is correct on more than one of his points.
One more
Unfortunately I assume we can’t arrange wagers on this forum. I’d give odds
Steve L is correct on more than one of his points.
One more reason to follow the no installation prior to plans review practice.
I’ve gone round and round more than once on 13-D that just don’t work
hydraulically.
Thank you for responding Steve. I was simply handed the sprinkler drawings and
asked to do the calculations. I will forward your information to the sprinkler
contractor. This one is going to hurt because the available pressure is 52 psi,
long under ground runs, and it’s a 3 story house. I hope
If you have a set-back deficiency and the project was permitted with the
upgraded sprinkler system as a condition of approval, it’s perfectly legit.
Before you designed the system, did the owner or their agent inform you that
there were alternative means and methods required?I would first
