Re: [Non-DoD Source] Re: FPE / SFPE

2018-09-28 Thread Ron Greenman
t; Cell: (612) 759-5556 > > > -Original Message- > From: Sprinklerforum [mailto: > sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Schmid, > Raymond P (Ray) CIV USARMY CESPK (US) > Sent: Friday, September 28, 2018 12:56 PM > To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler

RE: [Non-DoD Source] Re: FPE / SFPE

2018-09-28 Thread Scott Futrell
[mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Schmid, Raymond P (Ray) CIV USARMY CESPK (US) Sent: Friday, September 28, 2018 12:56 PM To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org Subject: RE: [Non-DoD Source] Re: FPE / SFPE I'm with Roland on this one. I always thought SFPE, among

RE: [Non-DoD Source] Re: FPE / SFPE

2018-09-28 Thread Schmid, Raymond P (Ray) CIV USARMY CESPK (US)
Of Roland Huggins Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2018 3:21 PM To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Re: FPE / SFPE The issue of unqualified engineers is an old song and dance that I don’t want to resurrect but this is a different nuance. I hope it doesn’t flare

RE: FPE / SFPE

2018-09-28 Thread Mark Eckard
) 702-0965 (Metro Atlanta) Mobile: 478-244-6653 SYL-216 *From:* Sprinklerforum *On Behalf Of *John Drucker *Sent:* Friday, September 28, 2018 6:23 AM *To:* sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org; sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org *Subject:* Re: FPE / SFPE It’s a joke, most AHJs know

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: FPE / SFPE

2018-09-28 Thread Mark . Phelps
o: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org<mailto:sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org> Subject: RE: FPE / SFPE I’m offended too – Sunday night. Though I’m presenting Monday so two drinks is the limit. From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Pe

RE: FPE / SFPE

2018-09-28 Thread gmc
: Sprinklerforum On Behalf Of John Drucker Sent: Friday, September 28, 2018 5:23 AM To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org; sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org Subject: Re: FPE / SFPE It's a joke, most AHJs know that the NICET techs are doing the heavy lift and the PE swoops in at the 11th

Re: FPE / SFPE

2018-09-28 Thread John Drucker
, 2018 6:29:49 PM To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org Subject: RE: FPE / SFPE I’m offended too – Sunday night. Though I’m presenting Monday so two drinks is the limit. From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Pete Schwab Sent: Thursday

FPE / SFPE: legitimate stamp

2018-09-27 Thread å . . . . . . .
There are those PE's stamping plans who are marginally qualified to take responsibility and authority for fire protection / fire safety material. And then there are those who are not PE's, stamping plans with electronic PE seals, albeit stamping without the individual PE approval. And yet these

RE: FPE / SFPE

2018-09-27 Thread John Irwin
ineers. Have a great and fire safe meeting! Jim Davidson From: Sprinklerforum On Behalf Of Roland Huggins Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2018 6:21 PM To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org Subject: Re: FPE / SFPE The issue of unqualified engineers is an old song and dance that I don’

RE: FPE / SFPE

2018-09-27 Thread Jim Davidson
To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org Subject: Re: FPE / SFPE The issue of unqualified engineers is an old song and dance that I don’t want to resurrect but this is a different nuance. I hope it doesn’t flare into a drawn out discussion but one reply on this thread then if you wish to discuss

RE: FPE / SFPE

2018-09-27 Thread Steve Leyton
: FPE / SFPE I’m offended. See you Saturday night From: Sprinklerforum On Behalf Of Roland Huggins Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2018 6:21 PM To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org Subject: Re: FPE / SFPE The issue of unqualified engineers is an old song and dance that I don’t want

RE: FPE / SFPE

2018-09-27 Thread Pete Schwab
I’m offended. See you Saturday night From: Sprinklerforum On Behalf Of Roland Huggins Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2018 6:21 PM To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org Subject: Re: FPE / SFPE The issue of unqualified engineers is an old song and dance that I don’t want to resurrect

Re: FPE / SFPE

2018-09-27 Thread Roland Huggins
The issue of unqualified engineers is an old song and dance that I don’t want to resurrect but this is a different nuance. I hope it doesn’t flare into a drawn out discussion but one reply on this thread then if you wish to discuss further, it’ll have to be over drinks. I never said they

FPE / SFPE - specification creation

2018-09-27 Thread å . . . . . . .
You don't have to hire an FPE to get a good review on an existing specification or to craft a good original specification. I would recommend hiring a good ITM technician to do the work, and then comb it over by a design professional after. Well written fire protection specifications literally

RE: FPE / SFPE

2018-09-27 Thread Scott Futrell
] On Behalf Of Scott Futrell Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2018 4:04 PM To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org Subject: FPE / SFPE Note that I changed the subject. I believe I’m offended now, my friend. SFPE’s Sprinkler Design for Engineers Class is specifically targeting the engineers that aren’t

FPE / SFPE

2018-09-27 Thread Scott Futrell
Note that I changed the subject. I believe I’m offended now, my friend. SFPE’s Sprinkler Design for Engineers Class is specifically targeting the engineers that aren’t FPE’s. It is a thirty-two hour class that is written and taught by incredibly talented individuals (Mr. Denhardt and Mr.