You are correct. Thanks
From: Ken Wagoner
Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2021 7:56 AM
To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
Cc: Jones, William - Fire Plans Examiner/Inspector ;
James Crawford ; Skyler Bilbo
Subject: Re: NFPA #13 (2013) Exterior Projections 8.15.7
Bill I looked back at
if there are combustibles stored below it.
Bill
-Original Message-
From: Sprinklerforum On Behalf
Of Skyler Bilbo via Sprinklerforum
Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2021 6:12 PM
To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
Cc: Skyler Bilbo ; James Crawford
Subject: Re: NFPA #13 (2013) Exterio
8.15.7.1 boiled down says projections over 4' have to be sprinklered underneath
unless they're the stuff outlined after, non combustible construction, or
non-combustible facings with sprinklers inside or 1 of the three exceptions
noted.
8.15.7.2 is a standalone, regardless of what you've had to
d below it.
Bill
-Original Message-
From: Sprinklerforum On Behalf
Of Skyler Bilbo via Sprinklerforum
Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2021 6:12 PM
To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
Cc: Skyler Bilbo ; James Crawford
Subject: Re: NFPA #13 (2013) Exterior Projections 8.15.7
I think you a
I think you are correct for your described situation: you have a
noncombustible overhang, under 4 ft, with no storage underneath, then no
sprinklers is OK.
It sure seems to me like we don't have to install sprinklers under
*combustible* overhangs 4 ft or less as long as there is no storage
underne
