RE: NFPA #13 (2013) Exterior Projections 8.15.7

2021-10-06 Thread Jones, William - Fire Plans Examiner/Inspector via Sprinklerforum
You are correct. Thanks From: Ken Wagoner Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2021 7:56 AM To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org Cc: Jones, William - Fire Plans Examiner/Inspector ; James Crawford ; Skyler Bilbo Subject: Re: NFPA #13 (2013) Exterior Projections 8.15.7 Bill I looked back

Re: NFPA #13 (2013) Exterior Projections 8.15.7

2021-10-06 Thread Ken Wagoner via Sprinklerforum
below it. Bill -Original Message- From: Sprinklerforum On Behalf Of Skyler Bilbo via Sprinklerforum Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2021 6:12 PM To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org Cc: Skyler Bilbo ; James Crawford Subject: Re: NFPA #13 (2013) Exterior Projections 8.15.7 I think you are

RE: NFPA #13 (2013) Exterior Projections 8.15.7

2021-10-06 Thread Mike Morey via Sprinklerforum
8.15.7.1 boiled down says projections over 4' have to be sprinklered underneath unless they're the stuff outlined after, non combustible construction, or non-combustible facings with sprinklers inside or 1 of the three exceptions noted. 8.15.7.2 is a standalone, regardless of what you've had

RE: NFPA #13 (2013) Exterior Projections 8.15.7

2021-10-06 Thread Jones, William - Fire Plans Examiner/Inspector via Sprinklerforum
it. Bill -Original Message- From: Sprinklerforum On Behalf Of Skyler Bilbo via Sprinklerforum Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2021 6:12 PM To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org Cc: Skyler Bilbo ; James Crawford Subject: Re: NFPA #13 (2013) Exterior Projections 8.15.7 I think you are correct

Re: NFPA #13 (2013) Exterior Projections 8.15.7

2021-10-05 Thread Skyler Bilbo via Sprinklerforum
I think you are correct for your described situation: you have a noncombustible overhang, under 4 ft, with no storage underneath, then no sprinklers is OK. It sure seems to me like we don't have to install sprinklers under *combustible* overhangs 4 ft or less as long as there is no storage