It's not al that cool, Brad. I have since found out that it is not pellets they
are making. They take old pallets, grind them up and compress them in to bricks
for burning (somewhere). The problem that a design was done by one of my
competitors based on 16 ft storage of Class II commodities
WOW! Looks like a great potential 6:00 news feature.How tall will those
flames be?
I'm constantly amazed at those who oversimplify and under design these kinds of
special hazard type operations then take the letter from the AHJ as basis for
relief from all liability if someone questions
attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/private/sprinklerforum/attachments/20121018/fbd1ec01/attachment.html
___
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo
and declarations,
who is paying them.
scot deal
excelsior fire engineering
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/private/sprinklerforum/attachments/20121018/b6e43b3f/attachment.html
This is at the beginning stages of my involvement, so I don't know everything
yet. The plans were stamped by a PE and I believe accepted by the AHJ. The
plans do state that the building is to be occupied as a press wood process and
manufacturing facility with no other details. To me, that
And grinding process will involve some metals parts (nails, metal bands,
screws etc.) sparking over freshly ground sawdust blown with hot air in
cyclones towards the dust collectors, as a side showexplosion detection
and suppression may need to be considered I reckon.
Sorry for my two-bobs
But Todd-
You're hired to just list the job?
Do it. Can't see where that could possibly involve liability, but with the
legal decisions one sees, I'd write a letter to the contractor you're listing
for and note your concerns, list it, and send em an invoice.
Think of all the NFPA 25
