Re: Area Increases

2021-01-26 Thread Kevin Hall via Sprinklerforum
I haven’t reviewed that lately, but I can take a look tomorrow. I do know that FM has required sprinklers to be installed parallel to the floor in storage applications where NFPA currently requires sprinklers to be installed parallel with the ceiling. On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 8:25 PM BRUCE VERHEI

Re: Area Increases

2021-01-26 Thread BRUCE VERHEI via Sprinklerforum
Kevin, Do FM data sheets now reflect results of these tests? Best. Bruce Verhei > On 01/26/2021 2:02 PM Kevin Hall via Sprinklerforum > wrote: > > > There is an active FPRF project that addresses storage occupancies and > sloped ceilings. It is currently in its third phase, and there has

Re: Area Increases

2021-01-26 Thread Kevin Hall via Sprinklerforum
There is an active FPRF project that addresses storage occupancies and sloped ceilings. It is currently in its third phase, and there has been some full scale testing at FM that I have witnessed. We might see some more options in the 2025 edition of the NFPA 13. Kevin Hall, M.Eng, P.E., CWBSP,

RE: Area Increases

2021-01-26 Thread JD Gamble via Sprinklerforum
Thanks all. It was a brain F$%t on several levels. The project causing my query isn't sloped (1:12) anyways . I can't imagine why I included it in the question. But I've had more coffee now so -Original Message- From: Sprinklerforum

Re: Area Increases

2021-01-26 Thread John Denhardt via Sprinklerforum
Steve is correct. Protection schemes are available to some extent by others; but currently not NFPA 13. My only point was to respond to the 30% increase due to slope as required by NFPA 13. Engineering judgement or other standards will need to be applied to those situations. The above is my

RE: Area Increases

2021-01-26 Thread Steve Leyton via Sprinklerforum
I assume this statement of intent was added because full-scale fire testing has only been undertaken in test cells that have flat ceilings (I would very much appreciate input from the manufacturing community in that regard). But that doesn't mean that we don't have to fire protect storage

Re: Area Increases

2021-01-26 Thread John Denhardt via Sprinklerforum
As Travis stated, slope ceilings are not covered under the protection schemes of NFPA 13 for "Storage". Thus, the increase does not apply to "Storage" unless miscellaneous or low-piled storage applies. NFPA 13 - 2019: 20.6.1 Ceiling Slope. The sprinkler system criteria specified in Chapters 20

RE: Area Increases

2021-01-26 Thread Travis Mack via Sprinklerforum
Slope >2:12 is not allowed for storage. So, you don't apply because it is not permitted. Dry system increase - yes. If you are talking misc storage or low pile where you use the OH or EH curve then yes, slope and dry increase. Travis Mack, CFPS, CWBSP, RME-G, SET Engineering Manager MFP

Area Increases

2021-01-26 Thread JD Gamble via Sprinklerforum
I know this answer is obvious before I even ask the question but for some reason I am befuddled in brain lock (must be Monday again today) Do you have to apply the area increase for dry systems and sloped ceilings to the area of operation for storage applications? JD Gamble LSS of Sheridan,