Wagoner
; sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
Subject: Re: [Sprinklerforum] Re: Decommissioning of Class II Hose Cabinet
I did state in my original post the the building was not sprinklered. Allowing
the assumption that the hose cabinets were domestically fed.
With regard to scope of work
of building owners and managers.
Steve
From: Ken Wagoner
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2022 8:36 AM
To: Owen Evans ; sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
Subject: [Sprinklerforum] Re: Decommissioning of Class II Hose Cabinet
Owen,
Let's think this through.
Are the existing hose cabinets fed from
Owen,
Let's think this through.
Are the existing hose cabinets fed from the same riser which supplies an
existing automatic fire sprinkler system? Doesn't California State Law
require that any work done which impacts the operational condition of a
non-residential fire sprinkler system be
REMINDER & WARNING
DO NOT ! (violations can result in loss of posting privileges)
Never, ever discuss pricing issues. Doing so can be construed as a violation of
anti-trust laws and can endanger the continuation of the SprinklerForum and the
tax-exempt status of AFSA. Due to the sensitivity of
We’re not allowed to talk about pricing on the Forum.
However, I think it’s safe to recommend that if you don’t like or aren’t sure
about a professional product or service fee, it’s a common practice to solicit
competitive proposals.
[cid:image001.jpg@01D85971.3169BF60]
Steve Leyton,
