...@fpdc.com
Subject: RE: Head replacement on pipe sched
Cecil,
I'll send you a photo, but the dry valve was replaced in the late 50s - early
60s and a backflow has been added as well. If you are looking for a system
that is 100 years old that has been unmolested, I may have something
!!
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2012 09:20:41 -0400
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
From: t...@fpdc.com
Subject: RE: Head replacement on pipe sched
Cecil,
I'll send you a photo, but the dry valve was replaced in the late 50s -
early 60s and a backflow has been added as well. If you are looking
I am recommending replacing all of the sprinklers on a pipe schedule system in
a school. SR or QR heads?
Sent from my iPhone
___
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
, SET, CFPS
Sprinkler Designer
BMW Constructors, Inc.
O: 317.651.0596 | C: 317.586.8111
www.bmwc.com
From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org on behalf of Todd - FPDC
Sent: Mon 7/2/2012 11:14 AM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: Head replacement
From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org on behalf of Todd - FPDC
Sent: Mon 7/2/2012 11:14 AM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: Head replacement on pipe sched
I am recommending replacing all of the sprinklers on a pipe schedule system
I think your asking if it is acceptable to convert an existing pipe
schedule with standard response sprinklers to quick response
sprinklers. Although you aren't required too change them since it is
existing, if I were you AND the sprinklers were going to be changed
anyways, I'd go that
This is a dry system installed in 1899. The current sprinklers are from 1954
(+/-) and are being replaced due to age. FWIW, we did an internal inspection
and are going to do a full flushing as well.
At 03:19 PM 7/2/2012, you wrote:
I think your asking if it is acceptable to convert an
