Subject: Re: 5 Year Inspection w/ CPVC
that's because it doesn't exist YET. It was added to NFPA 25 at the
ROP meeting. Unfortunately the ROP will not be published until June.
Until then the approach to take is that the 5 yr inspection is
predominately looking for evidence of excessive corrosion
that's because it doesn't exist YET. It was added to NFPA 25 at the
ROP meeting. Unfortunately the ROP will not be published until June.
Until then the approach to take is that the 5 yr inspection is
predominately looking for evidence of excessive corrosion activity
driven by MIC
But isn't galvanized corrossion resistant? But we still conduct internal
inspection.
--Original Message--
From: Roland Huggins
Sender: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
ReplyTo: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: Re: 5 Year Inspection w
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: Re: 5 Year Inspection w/ CPVC
that's because it doesn't exist YET. It was added to NFPA 25 at the
ROP meeting. Unfortunately the ROP will not be published until June.
Until then the approach to take is that the 5 yr inspection is
predominately looking
[mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Roland
Huggins
Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 1:16 PM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: Re: 5 Year Inspection w/ CPVC
that's because it doesn't exist YET. It was added to NFPA 25 at the
ROP meeting. Unfortunately the ROP
