gt; *5.2.2.1* *Pipe and fittings shall be free of mechanical damage,
>>
>> leakage, and corrosion.
>>
>> *5.2.2.2 *Sprinkler piping shall not be subjected to external
>>
>> loads by materials either resting on the pipe or hung from the
>>
>> pipe.
>>
>>
t; *From:* Sprinklerforum *On
> Behalf Of *Joe via Sprinklerforum
> *Sent:* Tuesday, May 19, 2020 1:51 PM
> *To:* sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
> *Cc:* Joe ; John Denhardt <
> jdenha...@firesprinkler.org>
> *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] Re: flex heads touching stuff
>
&g
: Sprinklerforum On Behalf
Of Joe via Sprinklerforum
Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2020 1:51 PM
To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
Cc: Joe ; John Denhardt
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: flex heads touching stuff
I can only speak from an electrical standpoint... For electrical:
https://www.ecmweb.com/national
I can only speak from an electrical standpoint... For electrical:
https://www.ecmweb.com/national-electrical-code/qa/article/20887010/code-qa
Raceways, cable assemblies, boxes, cabinets, and fittings must be securely
fastened in place. The ceiling-support wires or ceiling grid must not be
used to
I received this comment directly from Victaulic. I copies the applicable
section::
*John is correct in his response, there is no issue or code prohibiting
VicFlex from touching another component above the ceiling or the ceiling
itself. The question may arise regarding weight/load impact on the
Ceilings should be installed to ASTM C635/C635M
maximum unsupported length does not exceed 6'...
most new ceilings are designed to handle weight of light fixtures and other
things
but it does have its limits
Chuck Bamford
On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 12:08 PM Matt Grise via Sprinklerforum <
‘future’ renovations.
Mike Hill
From: Sprinklerforum On Behalf
Of Prahl, Craig/GVL via Sprinklerforum
Sent: Monday, May 18, 2020 3:51 PM
To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
Cc: Prahl, Craig/GVL ; Matt Grise ;
John Denhardt
Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: flex heads touching stuff
The flex drops
prinklerforum
Sent: Monday, May 18, 2020 1:20 PM
To:
sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org<mailto:sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org>
Cc: Michael Hill
Subject: RE: flex heads touching stuff
We have been told by one jurisdiction that we must support the flex so that it
does not rest o
effort to comply.
>
>
>
> Any idea where it might be written that touching is ok?
>
>
>
> Matt
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Sprinklerforum *On
> Behalf Of *John Denhardt via Sprinklerforum
> *Sent:* Monday, May 18, 2020 2:36 PM
> *To:* sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler
be written that touching is ok?
Matt
From: Sprinklerforum On Behalf
Of John Denhardt via Sprinklerforum
Sent: Monday, May 18, 2020 2:36 PM
To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
Cc: John Denhardt
Subject: Re: flex heads touching stuff
What I have been taught and read, no sprinkler unrelated
,
>
>
>
> Bob Knight, CET III
>
> Fire by Knight, LLC
>
> 208-318-3057
>
>
>
> *From:* Sprinklerforum [mailto:
> sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org] *On Behalf Of *Michael
> Hill via Sprinklerforum
> *Sent:* Monday, May 18, 2020 1:20 PM
> *To:* spr
Subject: RE: flex heads touching stuff
We have been told by one jurisdiction that we must support the flex so that
it does not rest on the ceiling. I haven't seen anything to back that up
either, but was easier to comply than to argue.
Mike Hill
From: Sprinklerforum On
Behalf Of Matt
Cc: Michael Hill
Subject: RE: flex heads touching stuff
We have been told by one jurisdiction that we must support the flex so that it
does not rest on the ceiling. I haven't seen anything to back that up either,
but was easier to comply than to argue.
Mike Hill
From: Sprinklerforum
We have been told by one jurisdiction that we must support the flex so that it
does not rest on the ceiling. I haven't seen anything to back that up either,
but was easier to comply than to argue.
Mike Hill
From: Sprinklerforum On Behalf
Of Matt Grise via Sprinklerforum
Sent: Monday, May 18,
14 matches
Mail list logo
