Thank you!
On Friday, November 13, 2015 at 3:03:41 AM UTC-8, Michael Bayer wrote:
>
>
>
> On 11/12/2015 11:46 AM, Alyssa Kwan wrote:
> > Thanks, Michael!
> >
> > In terms of the ReplaceableObject, I was hoping for a composite
> > operation that could use existing Alembic operations, without
On 11/12/2015 11:46 AM, Alyssa Kwan wrote:
> Thanks, Michael!
>
> In terms of the ReplaceableObject, I was hoping for a composite
> operation that could use existing Alembic operations, without needing to
> generate the underlying SQL.
For instance, the single composite
> operation would
I'd take a look at
http://alembic.readthedocs.org/en/latest/api/operations.html#operation-plugins
and for a longer example
http://alembic.readthedocs.org/en/latest/cookbook.html#replaceable-objects.
On 11/11/2015 04:26 PM, Alyssa Kwan wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have a single logical Alembic
Thanks, Michael!
In terms of the ReplaceableObject, I was hoping for a composite operation
that could use existing Alembic operations, without needing to generate the
underlying SQL. For instance, the single composite operation would use
Alembic's built-in create_table() in sequence with other
Hi all,
I have a single logical Alembic operation that is best implemented as a
series of lower level operations (like create_sequence, create_table(s),
add_constraint(s), etc.). What's the best way to implement this? I assume
it would be to somehow extend OpContainer? I don't see any
