On Sun, 2005-02-27 at 22:54 -0500, Robert L Cochran wrote:
> Is there a published file
> structure for the database?
>
The header comment to the btree.c source file.
http://www.sqlite.org/cvstrac/getfile/sqlite/src/btree.c
--
D. Richard Hipp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Sun, 2005-02-27 at 22:37 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Anyone have idea when sqlite will support sqlite3_exec16. Since
> sqlite3_exec return important error information for the execution error.
> Supporting exec16 is urgent for unicode application.
>
The implementation of
I've been fooling with 3.1.3 tonight and hex dumped one of my database
files:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] itemlist]$ hexdump -C -n 16 wishlist
53 51 4c 69 74 65 20 66 6f 72 6d 61 74 20 33 00 |SQLite
format 3.|
0010
Only the first 16 bytes are shown here. Is there a published file
> The last one is really annoying and I can't believe the
> auto-tests could have missed it ...
>
>create table a (id, x);
>create table b (id, y);
>insert into a values (1,1);
>insert into b values (1,2);
>select * from a inner join b;
>
> column names returned:
Hi All,
Anyone have idea when sqlite will support sqlite3_exec16. Since
sqlite3_exec return important error information for the execution error.
Supporting exec16 is urgent for unicode application.
Ming
http://www.sqlite.org/faq.html#q1
On Sun, 2005-02-27 at 15:31 -0500, Clay Dowling wrote:
> >
> >Anyone using other compiler to build sqlite on Windows ? Maybe Borland ?
> >I seems there is a lot o room for faster sqlite.dll by using other
> >compiers than VC++ 6. We can run some tests to see which is faster ...
> >
> I thought I
Hello sqlite-users,
If using an in-memory database, do the possible db corruption problems
when using multiple threads go away and can the same db handle
returned from the sqlite3_open call in the main thread be used by the
worker threads?
If not would it help to use mutexes to syncronize
Hello sqlite-users,
If using an in-memory database, do the possible db corruption problems
when using multiple threads go away and can the same db handle
returned from the sqlite3_open call in the main thread be used by the
worker threads?
If not would it help to use mutexes to syncronize
Olivier Singla wrote:
This said, I was wondering if anybody would like to share with me his/her
experience with this extension.
Also, any other solution available ?
You might want to read the SQLite web site pages about support. Dr. Hipp
offers an encrypted version of the database in exchange for
Ionut Filip wrote:
Hi,
So the VC++ 7.1 dll is much faster than the VC++ 6, up to 20% in some
operations, and the "MS mixed dll load bug" is not a problem, assuming
sqlite doesn't mix native code with managed .net code :).
Anyone using other compiler to build sqlite on Windows ? Maybe Borland ?
I
Jakub Adamek wrote:
select * from a inner join b;
Just as a general guide with any database system, this type of query
isn't particularly recommended because of the namespace issue. Here's
what I do to get around the problem (again, not just with SQLite):
1. Specify the criteria for the join
Hello sqlite-users,
If using an in-memory database, do the possible db corruption problems
when using multiple threads go away and can the same db handle
returned from a sqlite3_open call in the main thread to the worker threads?
If not would it help to use mutexes to syncronize access to the db
Ulrik Petersen wrote:
I have a copy of libobjc.a in cygwin/lib/mingw and copied it to
c:/dev-cpp/lib/gcc/mingw32/3.4.2 as lobjc.a
but this is not working
Unless your Cygwin version of libobjc.a is exactly the same as the one
that comes with dev-c++, I suspect this may not be a good idea.
Q. Lets say: I have a Field called: CoID (AKA: company id)
and when I create a new Table called Company
want to have the following:
CoID ( But when creating this field ) WHAT statement would define it, to
auto number by one and lock that number )
don't want any to change the CoID # that has been
Hi,
Olivier Singla wrote:
Hi,
I am planning to use sqlite in a PowerPC embedded device (using of course
Linux). So far I am extremely happy (and impressed!) by sqlite. The
only thing
I think I am missing is a way to protect the database (not only the
data by
themself, but also the database
The fact is, the pragmas regarding column names now seem completely
broken, as they do absolutely nothing. Was this by design, or a new bug
?
-Original Message-
From: D. Richard Hipp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, February 27, 2005 1:08 AM
To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org
Subject:
Hi,
I am planning to use sqlite in a PowerPC embedded device (using of course
Linux). So far I am extremely happy (and impressed!) by sqlite. The only
thing
I think I am missing is a way to protect the database (not only the data by
themself, but also the database schema).
There is a project
Hi,
So the VC++ 7.1 dll is much faster than the VC++ 6, up to 20% in some
operations, and the "MS mixed dll load bug" is not a problem, assuming
sqlite doesn't mix native code with managed .net code :).
Anyone using other compiler to build sqlite on Windows ? Maybe Borland ?
I seems there is a
19 matches
Mail list logo