Kees Nuyt 提到:
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 22:09:21 +0800, you wrote:
Hi all,
Is it possible to prevent this problem happens with SQLite DLL itself?
Please refer to
http://b6s.blogspot.com/2007/04/previous-version-ghost-on-vista-can-be.html
for problem description.
First of all: I have no
Try compiling with sqlite3.c from http://sqlite.org/sqlite-source-3_3_17.zip
It is already pre-generated and does not require generating the parser from
the .y file.
See: http://www.sqlite.org/cvstrac/wiki?p=TheAmalgamation
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> arm developer suite v1.2
> support
arm developer suite v1.2
support arm7,arm9
Joe Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
2007-04-26 11:03
Please respond to
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
To
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
cc
Subject
Re: [sqlite] how to compile sqlite3 in ads1.2 environment?
What's an ads1.2?
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
What's an ads1.2?
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Dose anybody compile the sqlite3 in the ads1.2 environment?
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
I compile the lemon.c in vc6 environment. (build it the win32 console
application )
then I use the command
lemon parse.y
I successfully get the parse.h file
but the file is not right.
I only get 137 ids
the follwing 15 ids do not exist in the parse.h
TK_TO_TEXT
TK_TO_BLOB
TK_TO_NUMERIC
The only restriction is to escape \0. I've been storing GB2312, BIG5 and
UTF8 Chinese characters since 2.x versions without any problem.
Japanese/korean characters should be OK.
Dennis Cote <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm still troubleshooting the test suite on Windows.
>
> I'm getting two failures on tests misc7-10 and misc7-11. These test look
> like they should work on Windows without change. Can anybody suggest
> what might be wrong?
>
Your previous changes left
I am continuing to try to get the complete test suite to run on Windows.
I have another strange error in test misc7-17.1:
misc7-17.1...
Error: couldn't open "test.db-journal": permission denied
The TCL code for this test is:
>> Thanks Donald. The results are now identical. So, it has to do with
>> buffer flushing differences between the machines. Now I have to
>> figure out what the differences are given that the XP laptop is
>> configured as shipped and is showing the performance improvement.
>
>
>Addendum. I
John Elrick wrote:
John Elrick wrote:
Griggs, Donald wrote:
John Elrick wrote:
"what the heck is happening that is creating a better than order of
magnitude difference in execution time on five out of seven Windows
machines?".
John,
If the database is opened and closed just once
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 22:09:21 +0800, you wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>Is it possible to prevent this problem happens with SQLite DLL itself?
>Please refer to
>http://b6s.blogspot.com/2007/04/previous-version-ghost-on-vista-can-be.html
>for problem description.
First of all: I have no hands on experience
John Elrick wrote:
Griggs, Donald wrote:
John Elrick wrote:
"what the heck is happening that is creating a better than order of
magnitude difference in execution time on five out of seven Windows
machines?".
John,
If the database is opened and closed just once for your testing, I
Griggs, Donald wrote:
John Elrick wrote:
"what the heck is happening that is creating a better than order of
magnitude difference in execution time on five out of seven Windows
machines?".
John,
If the database is opened and closed just once for your testing, I think
you can find
John Elrick wrote:
> "what the heck is happening that is creating a better than order of
> magnitude difference in execution time on five out of seven Windows
> machines?".
John,
If the database is opened and closed just once for your testing, I think
you can find out if buffer flushing is
John Elrick wrote:
"what the heck is happening that is creating a better than order of
magnitude difference in execution time on five out of seven Windows
machines?".
Sounds like different filesystem behavior, such as caching, returning
before the writing is actually done, etc.
Gerry
Igor Tandetnik wrote:
John Elrick wrote:
We tested the procedure under performance analysis on seven different
Windows machines, ranging from Windows 2000, Windows XP and Vista. In
five of the cases, inserting 128 rows outside of the context of a
transaction takes 11 - 17 seconds. In the
John Elrick wrote:
We tested the procedure under performance analysis on seven different
Windows machines, ranging from Windows 2000, Windows XP and Vista. In
five of the cases, inserting 128 rows outside of the context of a
transaction takes 11 - 17 seconds. In the other two cases, a Windows
On 4/25/07, Dennis Cote <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
To use the sqlite3.dll with Borland C++ you need to build a Borland
specific import library for the dll, and then add this library to your
project. The library will open the sqlute3 dll whenever you call one of
the included functions. This
I've encountered an unusual problem with SQLite performance under
Windows and am hoping someone might have an idea of what might be happening.
We are developing a Delphi application which uses SQLite compiled into
the program. During one round of tests we discovered a section of code
which
> It seems like the use_up_files command must work sometimes, since
> several iterations of the test worked (i.e. 6.1.1 and 6.1.2). I'm not
> sure what to make of the sequence of test failures and successes before
> it finally hangs.
>
> Since the comment indicates that this test is designed
Dennis Cote schrieb:
After fixing the exclusive2 test and running the quick test with no
errors, I decided to try the complete test suite, alltest.
I am getting failures on test misc7-6.1.x:
misc7-6.1.1... Ok
misc7-6.1.2... Ok
misc7-6.1.3...
Expected: [1]
Got: [0]
After fixing the exclusive2 test and running the quick test with no
errors, I decided to try the complete test suite, alltest.
I am getting failures on test misc7-6.1.x:
misc7-6.1.1... Ok
misc7-6.1.2... Ok
misc7-6.1.3...
Expected: [1]
Got: [0]
misc7-6.1.4... Ok
Scott Hill wrote:
Hello,
First time on this list. I am trying to get sqlite into an app using
Borlands C++Builder. I have included the sqlite3.h file and the code
compiles. However, when it tries to link I get an unresolved external
for
sqlite3_open, etc. Does anyone have any experience
Hi all,
Is it possible to prevent this problem happens with SQLite DLL itself?
Please refer to
http://b6s.blogspot.com/2007/04/previous-version-ghost-on-vista-can-be.html
for problem description.
Regards,
/Mike/
-
To
I think what he is trying to say is that you can store Japanese/Korean
characters in your database using a UTF-8 or Unicode string. We currently use
Sqlite and support Chinese, and plan to implement Japanese and Korean and have
had no problems. We store the text as a UTF-8 encoded string.
UTF-8 (or Unicode) rules!
Thanks for the quick reply. But, I havent understood. Can you be bit more
clear ?
Best Regards,
Pavan.
On 4/25/07, Tian-Jian Barabbas [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Pavan 提到:
> Hi,
>
> Can we store/retrieve Japanese/korean characters in sqlite db ?
>
Pavan 提到:
Hi,
Can we store/retrieve Japanese/korean characters in sqlite db ?
Thanks,
Pavan.
UTF-8 (or Unicode) rules!
Cheers,
Mike
-
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
Can we store/retrieve Japanese/korean characters in sqlite db ?
Thanks,
Pavan.
--
'
Always finish stronger than you start
*
A. Pagaltzis wrote:
* Jef Driesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-11 16:10]:
I managed to solve this problem now. I had to write my solution
(see below) in pseudo sql code (e.g some extra non-sql code was
required) because sqlite does not support stored procedures. It
think it is doable to
Dose anybody compile the sqlite3 in the ads1.2 environment?
30 matches
Mail list logo
