On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 03:44:52PM +0100, Simon Slavin scratched on the wall:
>
> There is no such datatype as 'INT' in SQLite.
SQLite doesn't have defined datatypes, so I suppose you could say
this is correct. But if you want to say that SQLite has no 'INT'
datatype, it is just as
On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 12:22:14PM +0200, Buschhardt, Thomas scratched on the
wall:
> Error: sqlite3 -separator ";" -csv ...
>
> The separator will ignored.
>
> Workaround: sqlite3 -csv -separator ";" ...
For what it is worth, this is the exact same inside the shell:
$ ./sqlite3
SQLite
This type of questions should go to sqlite-us...@sqlite.org.
Forwarding you there.
Pavel
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 6:52 PM, wrote:
> I am pretty new to Android but not new to programming.
>
> I want to do something that I thought was fairly simple, but can't seem to
> find any
On 1 Jul 2010, at 11:56am, Daniel Jung wrote:
> My problem: I wrote a simple program in c-sharp. This program does
> refers to a sqlite database. The program is in my auto boot so it shall
> run by starting by pc. But every time the is an exception that the
> database could not be opened. I
Thanks Tim for taking the time to point this out.
On 1 July 2010 13:41, Tim Romano wrote:
> If cross-implementation portability is a stated design goal, Adobe's
> departure from the "authoritative" behavior is indeed a bug. If
> cross-implementation portability is
Hi,
no idea if it's the right way or place but I have a question about the
sqlite database. I did not found any solution in other forums or by
using google.
My problem: I wrote a simple program in c-sharp. This program does
refers to a sqlite database. The program is in my auto boot so it
Error: sqlite3 -separator ";" -csv ...
The separator will ignored.
Workaround: sqlite3 -csv -separator ";" ...
Occours on WinXP, SQLite version 3.6.23.1
--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Thomas Buschhardt
Software-Entwickler
Bereich IT
Tel +49 3745 769 -301
Fax +49 3745 769 -334
eMail:
"Andy Gibbs" wrote on 1.7.2010 21:12:57:
>Miha Vrhovnik wrote on 1/7/2010:
>> >Content analysis details: (10.3 points, 7.0 required)
>> >
>> > pts rule name description
>> > --
>> >--
>> > 2.4
Miha Vrhovnik wrote on 1/7/2010:> >Content analysis details: (10.3 points,
7.0 required)> >> > pts rule name description> >
-- --> >
2.4 DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS RBL: Envelope sender listed in
Matheus Ledesma wrote:
> With "-ldl" after "-static" argument I receive the following error:
>
> balanca_simula_peso_io_paralela.c:632: warning: 'mseg1' may be used
> uninitialized in this function
>
>
With "-ldl" after "-static" argument I receive the following error:
balanca_simula_peso_io_paralela.c:632: warning: 'mseg1' may be used
uninitialized in this function
/home/generic/CodeSourcery/Sourcery_G++_Lite/bin/../arm-none-linux-gnueabi/libc/lib/libsqlite3.a(sqlite3.o):
In function
Matheus Ledesma wrote:
> "arm-none-linux-gnueabi-gcc -o balanca
> balanca_simula_peso_io_paralela.c -Wall -W -O2
> -Wl,-R/home/generic/CodeSourcery/Sourcery_G++_Lite/lib -lsqlite3
> -lpthread -static"
Try adding '-ldl' to your args.
Eric
--
Eric A. Smith
Where a calculator on the ENIAC is
Dear friends,
I was sucessfuly able to cross compile the source
sqlite-amalgamation-3.6.23.1 and it's working in the target.
The problem happens when I try to compile my program using the
sqlite3 libraries. I get the following error messages:
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 5:37 PM, Steve Hurst
wrote:
> Hi all, not sure if this is a bug or user error - any insight appreciated!
>
> I have a schema that defines a two column primary key on a table - the docs
> indicate this will create a unique composite key.
> There is no such datatype as 'INT' in SQLite. No part of SQLite should be
> declaring /any/ column as having an affinity of 'INT'.
Yet another holly war and another fake problem... :(
Why SQLite shouldn't declare column as INT? Who is confused by that
this time? Yes, I know that there's no
On 1 Jul 2010, at 2:49pm, Pavel Ivanov wrote:
>> This is obviously wrong. The SELECT command from TABLE t could never have
>> returned any INT values (because SQLite has no INT datatype). So why was
>> TABLE t_copy created with an INT column ?
>
> Because three letters INT are enough to
"Andy Gibbs" wrote on 1.7.2010 15:05:01:
>Content analysis details: (10.3 points, 7.0 required)
>
> pts rule name description
> -- --
> 2.4 DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS RBL: Envelope sender
Here is what I wrote to Jay earlier this morning but meant to send to the
entire list. I am still in the habit of hitting Reply in Google Mail when I
should be hitting a different button that also says Reply.
Jay,
I agree with 99.44% of what you say. If in the future ALTER TABLE would
allow a
On 1 July 2010 13:05, Andrew Wood wrote:
> I apologise if this is in the documentation but I cant seem to follow it.
>
> Is there a function in the C/C++ API which will escape an array of
> binary data. For example in MySQL there is the following function:
>
>
> This is obviously wrong. The SELECT command from TABLE t could never have
> returned any INT values (because SQLite has no INT datatype). So why was
> TABLE t_copy created with an INT column ?
Because three letters INT are enough to assign INTEGER affinity to the column.
> From
On 1 Jul 2010, at 2:21pm, Pavel Ivanov wrote:
>> CREATE TABLE X as SELECT...
>> syntax ought not to produce a table with an INT primary key if the prototype
>> had INTEGER.
The problem is not with primary keys, it's with the types of the columns in the
table. The command is not
CREATE TABLE
> No, I am not asking SQLite to "emulate an error" in Adobe's code. Rather I
> am suggesting this: if SQLite is going to distinguish in any way between INT
> and INTEGER on primary key definitions, the CREATE TABLE X as SELECT...
> syntax ought not to produce a table with an INT primary key if the
On Monday, May 03, 2010 4:47 PM, D. Richard Hipp wrote:
Subject: Proposed new sqlite3_open_v3() interface
> Community feedback is requested for the following proposed new SQLite
> C API:
>
>int sqlite3_open_v3(const char*, sqlite3**, int, const char*);
>
> The new database connection
I would be pleased to try that version, however
I'm not sure if you already support the SEE extension ?
At least I can't find it yet on the SEE Software Configuration System.
Marcus Grimm
D. Richard Hipp wrote:
> We are in the final phases of development for SQLite version 3.7.0.
> The key
Andrew Wood schrieb:
> I apologise if this is in the documentation but I cant seem to follow it.
>
> Is there a function in the C/C++ API which will escape an array of
> binary data. For example in MySQL there is the following function:
>
> mysql_real_escape_string(,out,in,length);
>
> What Id
I apologise if this is in the documentation but I cant seem to follow it.
Is there a function in the C/C++ API which will escape an array of
binary data. For example in MySQL there is the following function:
mysql_real_escape_string(,out,in,length);
What Id like to do is take a char array in
If cross-implementation portability is a stated design goal, Adobe's
departure from the "authoritative" behavior is indeed a bug. If
cross-implementation portability is not "officially" supported but is simply
something that users might expect and attempt, then Adobe's departure from
the
hi,
sorry for my late response, i was very busy the last few days (my wife was
in hospital and i had to care about the kids, pets and house and still had to
work :-)
i updated the sql.h.bz2 [http://greschenz.dyndns.org/downloads/sql.h.bz2] on
my server and fixed that topic.
you can now use
On Wednesday, June 30, 2010 7:21 PM, D. Richard Hipp wrote:
> We are in the final phases of development for SQLite version 3.7.0.
> The key enhancement over version 3.6.23.1 is support for the use of
> write-ahead logs for transaction control. See
> http://www.sqlite.org/draft/wal.html
> for
ah, sorry ...
Am 01.07.2010 09:49, schrieb Jan:
> Which row (node_id, attribute) is not unique?
>
> Jan
>
> Am 30.06.2010 23:37, schrieb Steve Hurst:
>> Hi all, not sure if this is a bug or user error - any insight appreciated!
>>
>> I have a schema that defines a two column primary key on a
Which row (node_id, attribute) is not unique?
Jan
Am 30.06.2010 23:37, schrieb Steve Hurst:
> Hi all, not sure if this is a bug or user error - any insight appreciated!
>
> I have a schema that defines a two column primary key on a table - the docs
> indicate this will create a unique composite
31 matches
Mail list logo