On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 3:28 PM, Shawn Bice wrote:
>
> Hello, I'm thinking about using SQLite on a windows file share having
> multiple clients reading and writing to the database. I think I understand
> the gist of how this works via some really good docs on the SQLite
On 13 Jul 2011, at 11:28pm, Shawn Bice wrote:
> I believe we will have moderate multi-client traffic and I was hoping to gain
> some additional perspective from folks who have far more experience using
> SQLite in this config.
If your intention from the ground up is to do lots of concurrent
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/13/2011 10:56 AM, Jan Hudec wrote:
> In my experience, the .o files are significantly larger than the resulting
> binary.
The size command will tell you how big the code (aka text), data and zero
initialized data (aka bss) are for object or
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/13/2011 03:06 PM, Samuel Neff wrote:
> The BerkleyDB backed version of SQLite from Oracle supports page level
> locking. Apparently this is where the real performance gains come from, not
> swapping out the back-end.
That only helps with
Hello, I'm thinking about using SQLite on a windows file share having multiple
clients reading and writing to the database. I think I understand the gist of
how this works via some really good docs on the SQLite site but from what I can
tell, it sounds like this isn't a canonical scenario for
The BerkleyDB backed version of SQLite from Oracle supports page level
locking. Apparently this is where the real performance gains come from, not
swapping out the back-end.
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/database/berkeleydb/downloads/index.html
Are there any plans to add page-level locking
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 17:37:57 +0300, Baruch Burstein wrote:
> The website (http://www.sqlite.org/about.html) says that sqlite can be
> compiled to under 300K. I am using mingw32, and with no configuration did I
> manage to get sqlite3.o below 400k. What compiler/compiler options are used
> to
> If I was to attach a database located in a file on disk to a database located
> in memory, would the file DB be loaded in memory too, or would its usage
> remain disk-based?
Its usage would be the same as if you open a new connection to that
database file, i.e. disk-based (barring the page
On 07/13/2011 10:18 PM, Alexandre G wrote:
>
> If I was to attach a database located in a file on disk to a database located
> in memory, would the file DB be loaded in memory too, or would its usage
> remain disk-based?
It remains on disk. Whether or not the main database is in-memory does
not
If I was to attach a database located in a file on disk to a database located
in memory, would the file DB be loaded in memory too, or would its usage
remain disk-based?
I need to know because we want to keep memory usage to a minimum. Note that
the disk is read-only.
Thanks
--
View this
The table A3Test7D4_E is deleted and re-written every time.
The table ENTRY_ATTRIBUTES is large table (millions of records) and it will need
an analyze when made first time. Doesn't look cache is the reason for
this behaviour
here.
RBS
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Stephen C
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 01:18, H. Phil Duby wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 23:22, Stephan Beal wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 4:25 AM, Tom Browder
>> wrote:
>>
>> > sqlite db files and making sure that directory is
Some mistakes...
* I use also PRAGMA cache_size=100 but the some problem
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Anze Rozman wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I have an application which inserts into database most of the time. Problem
> is that memory is decreasing. Aplication is in java and I
Hi!
I have an application which inserts into database most of the time. Problem
is that memory is decreasing. Aplication is in java and I use Werner's
sqlite wrapper - http://www.ch-werner.de/javasqlite/ (because of J2ME). I
use method
Hi!
SQL Maestro Group announces the release of AnySQL Maestro 11.7, a powerful
tool for managing any database engine accessible via ODBC driver or OLE DB
provider (SQLite, PostgreSQL, MySQL, SQL Server, Oracle, Access, etc). The
new version is immediately available at
What happens when you let the query run the first time, delete the
records, then re-run the query?
If the same length of time is spent (50 seconds) then I'm at a loss.
If the shorter length of time happens, I'd say blame caching.
On 07/13/2011 06:00 AM, Bart Smissaert wrote:
> Have the
On 07/13/2011 05:05 PM, Alexey Pechnikov wrote:
> With synonyms dictionary the result token length can be more then
> original token length.
> Is it problem for current realization of FTS?
I don't think so. If it is, it's a bug.
Dan.
___
sqlite-users
With synonyms dictionary the result token length can be more then
original token length.
Is it problem for current realization of FTS?
--
Best regards, Alexey Pechnikov.
http://pechnikov.tel/
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
I want to add stopwords table support for ICU tokenizer but there is
no database handle access (icuOpen).
Any ideas?
--
Best regards, Alexey Pechnikov.
http://pechnikov.tel/
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
Have the following query:
INSERT INTO A3Test7D4_J (PATIENT_ID, ENTRY_ID, READ_CODE, TERM_TEXT,
ADDED_DATE, START_DATE, NUMERIC_VALUE, TYPE_SPECIFIC_INFO) SELECT
E.PATIENT_ID, E.ENTRY_ID, E.READ_CODE, E.TERM_TEXT, E.ADDED_DATE,
E.START_DATE, EA.NUMERIC_VALUE, EA.TYPE_SPECIFIC_INFO FROM A3Test7D4_E
On 07/13/2011 04:57 AM, Abhinav Upadhyay wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Quoting the ranking function given in the appendix of the FTS3
> documentation page (http://www.sqlite.org/fts3.html#appendix_a)
>
> static void rankfunc(sqlite3_context *pCtx, int nVal, sqlite3_value **apVal){
>int *aMatchinfo;
21 matches
Mail list logo