Hi,
forget to mention that a function like this was earlier considered as
being tricky and living dangerously.
Also we found a bug (missing break) between line 80 and 81 which will
lead to a memory leak every time a text value is stored ...
switch (pval->t) {
case
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 7:15 PM, Eric Hill wrote:
> to the data. But SQLite doesn't really have any functions that manipulate
> Julian dates (as far as I can tell). We have written our own SQL date
> functions anyway. So maybe I can just avoid this issue entirely.
>
FWIW, strftime() uses
On 22 Feb 2016, at 6:15pm, Eric Hill wrote:
> Length(theDate) returns 9, and typeof(theDate) returns "real". I assume
> typeof is just returning the character version of the column affinity.
No. typeof() is returning the type of that specific piece of data, not the
column in general. In
Hey, Simon,
Length(theDate) returns 9, and typeof(theDate) returns "real". I assume typeof
is just returning the character version of the column affinity.
Typeof(MAX(theDate)) and length(MAX(theDate)) also return "real" and 9
respectively.
At this point, I am rethinking the decision to
Actually, you can. If you pass a real to datetime it will return the correct
result:
sqlite> select typeof(cast(julianday('now') as real));
real
sqlite> select datetime(cast(julianday('now') as real));
2016-02-23 00:43:37
This is because datetime (the time functions) accept a string of the
On 22 February 2016 at 17:07, Michele Pradella
wrote:
> CREATE INDEX indexAB ON test(DateTime,CarPlate);
CREATE INDEX indexA ON test(DateTime);
>
So if I have a query like this
>>> "SELECT * FROM table_name WHERE DateTime>> DateTime>VALUE_MIN"
>>>
>>
> Generally
On 22 Feb 2016, at 4:02pm, Eric Hill wrote:
> I can call sqlite3_column_decltype() and get back "REAL_DATE" and know I
> should convert.
>
> However, if I execute this SQL:
>
> SELECT MAX( theDate ) FROM t1;
>
> My call to sqlite3_column_decltype() returns nothing - the decltype of the
>
Hey,
I'm at 3.8.11.1 of SQLite - could move to more recent version if it would help.
When I move date columns into SQLite, I declare their type as "REAL_DATE". I
do this because I convert from my application's date (seconds since 1904) to
Julian date (a date that SQLite likes, sort of) when
21 feb 2016, Igor Tandetnik:
> On 2/21/2016 12:09 PM, Olivier Mascia wrote:
>> Is it possible to implement a SQL function
>> (https://www.sqlite.org/c3ref/create_function.html
>> ), which implementation would be able to return the same value for
>> the duration of the current transaction?
>>
On 02/22/2016 10:27 AM, Ephraim Stevens wrote:
> Greetings All,
>
> I use the Full Text Search facilities extensively. The feature is intuitive
> and works beautifully and super fast even with 100GB+ databases. I must
> applaud the SQLITE dev team on such amazing work.
>
> I have two questions
On 02/21/2016 03:54 PM, Charles Leifer wrote:
> Is anyone aware of a design doc for any of the FTS implementations? Looking
> for something a bit more technical than the docs. If not, where in the
> source would you recommend starting? Thanks!
There is no such document unfortunately.
The FTS5
On 2/22/16, Eric Hill wrote:
>
> But SQLite doesn't really have any functions that
> manipulate Julian dates (as far as I can tell).
If you mean "Julian Calendar" you are correct. If you mean "Julian
Day Number", then all of the built-in SQLite date-manipulation
functions will work fine. Note
On 2/22/16, Eric Hill wrote:
> I assume
> typeof is just returning the character version of the column affinity.
No. typeof returns the datatype of the value in its argument.
--
D. Richard Hipp
drh at sqlite.org
Perfect, thank you!
On Feb 22, 2016 1:55 AM, "Dan Kennedy" wrote:
> On 02/21/2016 03:54 PM, Charles Leifer wrote:
>
>> Is anyone aware of a design doc for any of the FTS implementations?
>> Looking
>> for something a bit more technical than the docs. If not, where in the
>> source would you
sqlite> create table mytable(f1 integer,f2 integer,f3 integer);
sqlite> insert into mytable
values(1,2,8),(1,3,9),(2,4,8),(2,5,2),(3,6,4),(3,7,8),(4,2,4);
sqlite> select f1, max(f2), f3 from mytable where (f3&8)!=0 group by f1;
1|3|9
2|4|8
3|7|8
sqlite>
Hi,
I am using SQLite 3.11. I create a table as follows:
CREATE TABLE MyTable (F1 INTEGER, F2
INTEGER, F3 INTEGER);
Then add the following records:
INSERT INTO MyTable (F1, F2, F3) Values (1,
2, 8);
> On 22 Feb 2016, at 9:07am, Michele Pradella
> wrote:
>
>> Already done this check. My last question was about to reduce the number of
>> indexes on table avoiding kill a "quite unnecessary" index that if used do a
>> better job that the other.
>> Generally speaking, I think that if you use
>>> Your indexes are badly designed.
>>>
>>> You require the following two indexes:
>>> CREATE INDEX indexAB ON test(DateTime,CarPlate);
>>> CREATE INDEX indexBA ON test(CarPlate,DateTime);
>>>
>>> The indexes:
CREATE INDEX indexA ON test(DateTime);
CREATE INDEX indexB ON test(CarPlate);
> Your indexes are badly designed.
>
> You require the following two indexes:
> CREATE INDEX indexAB ON test(DateTime,CarPlate);
> CREATE INDEX indexBA ON test(CarPlate,DateTime);
>
> The indexes:
>> CREATE INDEX indexA ON test(DateTime);
>> CREATE INDEX indexB ON test(CarPlate);
> serve no
On 22 Feb 2016, at 9:07am, Michele Pradella
wrote:
> Already done this check. My last question was about to reduce the number of
> indexes on table avoiding kill a "quite unnecessary" index that if used do a
> better job that the other.
> Generally speaking, I think that if you use and index
On 22 Feb 2016, at 8:39am, Michele Pradella
wrote:
>> Your indexes are badly designed.
>>
>> You require the following two indexes:
>> CREATE INDEX indexAB ON test(DateTime,CarPlate);
>> CREATE INDEX indexBA ON test(CarPlate,DateTime);
>>
>> The indexes:
>>> CREATE INDEX indexA ON
You have a bug (missing break) between line 80 and 81 which will lead to a
memory leak every time a text value is stored ...
switch (pval->t) {
case SQLITE_INTEGER:
pval->n=0;
pval->i=sqlite3_value_int64(arg);
break;
case SQLITE_TEXT:
yes, you are right, I actually have the same version, two years old anyway
The feature I was missing is "savefile and writefile" functions for blob
fields which comes I think in 2014-06
(http://www.sqlite.org/src/finfo?name=ext/misc/fileio.c)
So for that problem, probably it is enough adding
23 matches
Mail list logo
