>Von: sqlite-users [mailto:sqlite-users-boun...@mailinglists.sqlite.org] Im
>Auftrag von Dominique Devienne
>
>On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 9:32 AM Hick Gunter wrote:
>> >Of course, it may be that the writer of the VTable should know what they
>> >are doing and generate a VTable definition that is
On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 11:08 PM Simon Slavin wrote:
> On 6 Feb 2020, at 9:23pm, Rael Bauer wrote:
> > Is a foreign key field automatically indexed, or will it benefit from a
> > separately created index?
> No indexes for either lookup are automatically created.
The shell's .expert command
> Looks like there should be one argument after the "matchinfo" for
each > column in the table. So:
> SELECT rank(matchinfo(event_search_test), 1.0, 1.0) AS rank,
> room_id...
Yes, I realised that nVal is the number of arguments passed to the
function, so according to nVal!=(1+nCol) I have
The page https://sqlite.org/lang_UPSERT.html includes the following
text:
Some examples will help illustrate the difference:
CREATE TABLE vocabulary(word TEXT PRIMARY KEY, count INT DEFAULT 1);
INSERT INTO vocabulary(word) VALUES('jovial')
ON CONFLICT(word) DO
On 6 Feb 2020, at 9:23pm, Rael Bauer wrote:
> Is a foreign key field automatically indexed, or will it benefit from a
> separately created index?
No indexes for either lookup are automatically created. You should create
indexes which will help lookup in both directions, unless one of the
Hi,
Is a foreign key field automatically indexed, or will it benefit from a
separately created index?
E.g.
CREATE TABLE [content](
[note_id] INTEGER REFERENCES [notes]([id]) ON DELETE CASCADE,
[data] BLOB);
Will note_id benefit from a separately created index?
Thanks
Rael
Hi
Here are a few remarks and questions about
SQLITE_OMIT_LOOKASIDE and
SQLITE_OMIT_TWOSIZE_LOOKASIDE:
1) SQLite has SQLITE_OMIT_LOOKASIDE to
disable lookaside memory completely at compilation time.
However, I see that some of the lookaside code
is not disabled by SQLITE_OMIT_LOOKASIDE.
For
Unfortunately no, since the code is all proprietary and includes extensive
generated code.
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: sqlite-users [mailto:sqlite-users-boun...@mailinglists.sqlite.org] Im
Auftrag von Nelson, Erik - 2
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 6. Februar 2020 14:57
An: SQLite mailing
On 2/6/20, chiahui chen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After few attempts to load csv extension, (already tried
>
> gcc -arch x86_64 -g -fPIC -dynamiclib csv.c -o csv.dylib
>
> and
>
> gcc -g -fPIC -dynamiclib csv.c -o csv.dylib
> )
> Mac terminal returns errors as followings:
I don't know what is
Hi,
After few attempts to load csv extension, (already tried
gcc -arch x86_64 -g -fPIC -dynamiclib csv.c -o csv.dylib
and
gcc -g -fPIC -dynamiclib csv.c -o csv.dylib
)
Mac terminal returns errors as followings:
csv.c:115:3: error: no member named '__builtin___vsnprintf_chk' in
Hick Gunter wrote on Thursday, February 6, 2020 3:32 AM
>We are almost exclusively using virtual tables to allow queries against our
>internal data sources,
>which are C language structs and thus strictly typed. The column affinities
>provided by the VTab
>implementations are used for
On 6/2/63 19:00, Andrea Spacca wrote:
Hello,
I experienced seeing no results for search in matrix-syanpse backed by
sqlite3 storage. Tracking down the their source code I identified the
query:
https://github.com/matrix-org/synapse/blob/v1.9.1/synapse/storage/data_stores/main/search.py#L424
On 2/6/20, Damian Wilson wrote:
>
> Probably benign, but nice if it was cleaned up.
>
Correct. It is benign - identical machine code is generated with and
without the extra statement. And, curiously, the problem was not
detected by GCC even with -Wall -Wextra -pedantic-errors. Thanks for
Hi folks
Firstly, apologies if this should go to the -dev user list, but I had to start
somewhere. I noticed the following double return issue in 3.31.1 source code:
Main.c:
const char *sqlite3_filename_database(const char *zFilename){
return databaseName(zFilename);
return
Hello,
I experienced seeing no results for search in matrix-syanpse backed by
sqlite3 storage. Tracking down the their source code I identified the
query:
https://github.com/matrix-org/synapse/blob/v1.9.1/synapse/storage/data_stores/main/search.py#L424
I then run the query directly on a
On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 9:32 AM Hick Gunter wrote:
> >Of course, it may be that the writer of the VTable should know what they are
> >doing and generate a VTable definition that is consistent with how their
> >cursor methods return data, however ... this will omit the OP_Affinity if no
>
>Von: sqlite-users [mailto:sqlite-users-boun...@mailinglists.sqlite.org] Im
>Auftrag von Keith Medcalf
>Betreff: [EXTERNAL] Re: [sqlite] Patch: VTable Column Affinity Question and
>Change Request
>
>
>Patch to Fix Column Affinity not applied to Virtual Columns.
>
>In expr.c function
17 matches
Mail list logo
