I'd like to propose the following simple piece of code be added to sqlite. I
believe it has some benefits for those who've wrapped the sqlite api's keeping
copies in memory of the sql statement being executed.
Add an api call that will return the saved SQL if using sqlite3_prepare_v2 or
Partitioning an API at the wrong level punishes users who have carefully
structured interfaces by needlessly bloating their code. It is hard to
have a "Lite" embedded application when code bloat swells the library
routines.
Ken wrote:
It should save some time. How much is questionable.
Denis,
Thanks for the great explanation !!!
Regards,
Ken
Dennis Cote <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ken wrote:
> It should save some time. How much is questionable.
>
> Why would sqlite have to bind the Pointer bound variables? Isn't the strategy
> of binding to associate a
Ken wrote:
It should save some time. How much is questionable.
Why would sqlite have to bind the Pointer bound variables? Isn't the strategy of binding to associate a variable with a statment? Why should I have to continually re-associate the bindings with a statement thats allready been
It should save some time. How much is questionable.
Why would sqlite have to bind the Pointer bound variables? Isn't the strategy
of binding to associate a variable with a statment? Why should I have to
continually re-associate the bindings with a statement thats allready been
prepared and
ken-33 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anyone thoughts?
>
I would rather not complicate the existing API
unnecessarily by add bells and whistles that can
be easily implemented using simple by wrappers.
>
> ken-33 wrote:
> >
> > Question for the list,
> >
> > I'd like to optimize my code,
Anyone thoughts?
ken-33 wrote:
>
> Question for the list,
>
> I'd like to optimize my code, using the following pseudo code as an
> example.
>
> ===
> int i = 0 ;
> char str[20];
>
> sqlite3_prepare_v2( "insert into t1 values (?,?)" )
>
I don't see how your modified version is any better than just putting
the sqlite3_bind_int() inside the loop. You've superficially lifted
some code out of the loop, but sqlite3_step() is going to have to go
through and bind all of the "pointer bound" variables in your
suggested API, so it won't
Anyone
Ken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Question for the list,
I'd like to optimize my code, using the following pseudo code as an example.
===
int i = 0 ;
char str[20];
sqlite3_prepare_v2( "insert into t1 values (?,?)" )
sqlite3_bind_int ( i )
Question for the list,
I'd like to optimize my code, using the following pseudo code as an example.
===
int i = 0 ;
char str[20];
sqlite3_prepare_v2( "insert into t1 values (?,?)" )
sqlite3_bind_int ( i )
sqlite3_bind_text(str)
BEGIN TRANSACTION
10 matches
Mail list logo
