On 5 May 2007, at 17:11, Joe Wilson wrote:
What timings do you get when you run the perl script in my last email?
Your script inevitably was fine. What seems to cause the trouble is
something nasty in the pathnames. I've modified my perl script to
sanitize them by removing any non-ASCII
On 5 May 2007, at 17:11, Joe Wilson wrote:
What timings do you get when you run the perl script in my last email?
I'll try it Tuesday, I'm not back at work till then.
-
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Tim Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I can't reproduce your problem. I can insert 16M records into your
> > table
> > schema in 25 minutes on a 5 year old Windows machine. The sqlite3
> > process
> > had peak RAM usage of less than 20M.
>
> Rats, I suspect it must be some
On 5 May 2007, at 15:59, Joe Wilson wrote:
Ignore the idea above - an insert of NULL or an incrementing
integer for the
INTEGER PRIMARY KEY yields the same timings.
I might try taking it out anyway - I don't really need it other than
to be able to say "look at row n" to someone.
I did
--- Joe Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > create table filemap(id integer primary key,
> >uid integer, gid integer, mtime integer,
> >vol integer,
> >path varchar(1024));
> >
> > It has no indices built yet.
> >
> > I'm adding quite a lot of records to it using a perl script
> create table filemap(id integer primary key,
>uid integer, gid integer, mtime integer,
>vol integer,
>path varchar(1024));
>
> It has no indices built yet.
>
> I'm adding quite a lot of records to it using a perl script which
> generates SQL like this:
>
> begin;
> insert into
Apologies if I should have found an answer to this by searching or
being less naive about SQL!
I'm using 3.3.17 built by me with gcc (3.4.3? can't check just now as
machine is at work - it's the one Sun ship anyway) on a SPARC Solaris
10u3 box.
I don't have any significant experience of
7 matches
Mail list logo
