Re: [sqlite] Documentation update request

Kevin Benson, on Thursday, August 15, 2019 02:40 PM, wrote... > > On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 2:33 PM Jose Isaias Cabrera, on > wrote: > > Oh! Trickery! > > > > > Dickery (sometimes a nickname for RICHARD ;-) > Doc (...umentation; the something Richard "Dick" Hipp was doing ;-) I could never use

Re: [sqlite] Documentation update request

On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 2:33 PM Jose Isaias Cabrera wrote: > Richard Hipp, on Thursday, August 15, 2019 01:32 PM, wrote... > > > > On 8/15/19, Simon Slavin, on > > > On 15 Aug 2019, at 5:20pm, Richard Damon, on > > > > > >> You under quote, the faq says it “can not be changed (except under > >

Re: [sqlite] Documentation update request

Richard Hipp, on Thursday, August 15, 2019 01:32 PM, wrote... > > On 8/15/19, Simon Slavin, on > > On 15 Aug 2019, at 5:20pm, Richard Damon, on > > > >> You under quote, the faq says it “can not be changed (except under > >> extra-ordinary conditions).”, and those extra-ordinary conditions are a >

Re: [sqlite] Documentation update request

On 8/15/19, Simon Slavin wrote: > On 15 Aug 2019, at 5:20pm, Richard Damon wrote: > >> You under quote, the faq says it “can not be changed (except under >> extra-ordinary conditions).”, and those extra-ordinary conditions are a >> link to the second section you mention. > > I didn't notice

Re: [sqlite] Documentation update request

On 15 Aug 2019, at 5:20pm, Richard Damon wrote: > You under quote, the faq says it “can not be changed (except under > extra-ordinary conditions).”, and those extra-ordinary conditions are a link > to the second section you mention. I didn't notice that, for some reason. Thanks for the

Re: [sqlite] Documentation update request

> On Aug 15, 2019, at 10:37 AM, Simon Slavin wrote: > > > > says that sqlite_master cannot be changed. > > > > tells you how to change it. > You under quote, the faq says it “can not be changed (except

[sqlite] Documentation update request

says that sqlite_master cannot be changed. tells you how to change it. ___ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org

Re: [sqlite] Documentation update

On 9 Apr 2018, at 11:02am, R Smith wrote: > If you prefer "different from" to "different to", it is simply likely that > you are American rather than English, in which language the preference (I > should say "habit" really) is "different to" rather than "different

Re: [sqlite] Documentation update

I'm adding to my bucket list meeting some of you in person. On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 5:58 AM, Niall O'Reilly wrote: > On 9 Apr 2018, at 11:02, R Smith wrote: > > > Gentlemen - shall we call pistols at dawn to settle this? > > Or my favourite duel: Face-pulling at midnight.

Re: [sqlite] Documentation update

On 9 Apr 2018, at 11:02, R Smith wrote: > Gentlemen - shall we call pistols at dawn to settle this? > Or my favourite duel:  Face-pulling at midnight.  :) 8-) /Niall signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ sqlite-users mailing list

Re: [sqlite] Documentation update

On 2018/04/09 10:51 AM, Niall O'Reilly wrote: On 9 Apr 2018, at 2:08, Simon Slavin wrote: "In unique indices, each NULL value is considered different to every other NULL value. Thus each NULL value is unique." For the sake of my late English teacher, I hope the revised document will read

Re: [sqlite] Documentation update

On 9 Apr 2018, at 2:08, Simon Slavin wrote: > "In unique indices, each NULL value is considered different to every other > NULL value. Thus each NULL value is unique." For the sake of my late English teacher, I hope the revised document will read "... different __from__ ...". Best regards,

Re: [sqlite] Documentation update

On 9 Apr 2018, at 1:08am, Don V Nielsen wrote: > "For the purposes of unique indices, all NULL values are considered [to] > different from all other NULL values and are thus unique." > > I think it should read "...NULL value are considered different..." > >

Re: [sqlite] Documentation update

"to be", or not "to be" :) On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 7:08 PM, Don V Nielsen wrote: > "For the purposes of unique indices, all NULL values are considered [to] > different from all other NULL values and are thus unique." > > I think it should read "...NULL value are

[sqlite] Documentation update

"For the purposes of unique indices, all NULL values are considered [to] different from all other NULL values and are thus unique." I think it should read "...NULL value are considered different..." https://www.sqlite.org/lang_createindex.html dvn ___

Re: [sqlite] Documentation update 2

Thank YOU. Fix looks good now. ___ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users

Re: [sqlite] Documentation update

On 2018/01/31 3:13 PM, Simon Slavin wrote: I see. It has already been fixed. Sorry for the niggle. Simon. It's hard to stay on top of an error in the SQLite universe They disappear so darn quick. ___ sqlite-users mailing list

Re: [sqlite] Documentation update

On 31 Jan 2018, at 1:11pm, Kees Nuyt wrote: > On Wed, 31 Jan 2018 13:07:17 +, Simon Slavin > wrote: >> >> Can you clarify your correction ? I don't see a difference. > > It used to be: > 8.3. I/O while obtaining a lock leads to corruption > > (the

Re: [sqlite] Documentation update

On Wed, 31 Jan 2018 13:07:17 +, Simon Slavin wrote: > > >On 30 Jan 2018, at 6:51pm, William Entriken wrote: > >> Hello. Regarding https://www.sqlite.org/howtocorrupt.html, item 8.3. >> Perhaps this should be >> >>> 8.3. I/O error while obtaining

Re: [sqlite] Documentation update

On 30 Jan 2018, at 6:51pm, William Entriken wrote: > Hello. Regarding https://www.sqlite.org/howtocorrupt.html, item 8.3. > Perhaps this should be > >> 8.3. I/O error while obtaining a lock leads to corruption Can you clarify your correction ? I don't see a difference.

Re: [sqlite] Documentation update 2

Fixed now (I think). Thanks for the bug reports On 1/30/18, William Entriken wrote: > Hello again. Regarding https://www.sqlite.org/howtocorrupt.html, item 8.6. > Currently: > >> This race condition had apparently existing in all prior versions of > SQLite... > > Should

[sqlite] Documentation update 2

Hello again. Regarding https://www.sqlite.org/howtocorrupt.html, item 8.6. Currently: > This race condition had apparently existing in all prior versions of SQLite... Should be: > This race condition had apparently existed in all prior versions of SQLite... Regards, William Entriken

[sqlite] Documentation update

Hello. Regarding https://www.sqlite.org/howtocorrupt.html, item 8.3. Perhaps this should be > 8.3. I/O error while obtaining a lock leads to corruption Regards, William Entriken ___ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org

Re: [sqlite] Documentation update request

Hi, Simon, von Simon Slavin > On 4 Sep 2013, at 3:05pm, Markus Schaber > wrote: > > > Afaics, this applies to partial indices for similar reasons. > > I did not even know partial indices was implemented. Thank you. It's new in 3.8.0 :-) Best regards Markus Schaber

Re: [sqlite] Documentation update request

On 4 Sep 2013, at 3:05pm, Markus Schaber wrote: > Afaics, this applies to partial indices for similar reasons. I did not even know partial indices was implemented. Thank you. Simon. ___ sqlite-users mailing list

Re: [sqlite] Documentation update request

Hi, von Simon Slavin > Could the page > > > > please be updated to reflect the introduction of WAL mode ? I know this > doesn't change the format of the database file itself, but it does change the > format of files on disk, and it does mean that earlier

[sqlite] Documentation update request

Could the page please be updated to reflect the introduction of WAL mode ? I know this doesn't change the format of the database file itself, but it does change the format of files on disk, and it does mean that earlier and later versions of SQLite