On 21 Oct 2009, at 5:58pm, Jan wrote:
> thx bruce, but I am addicted to open-source.
If you want an open source server/client SQL engine, designed from the
ground up to work correctly when accessed from many computers at once,
I recommend MySQL. It is easier, faster and more efficient to
I'm addicted to amazingly powerful solutions done in minutes; using
the one-stop-shopping Lowe's Hardware of data solutions has its own
addictive powers.
Depends on how you value your time.
On Oct 21, 2009, at 9:58 AM, Jan wrote:
> thx bruce, but I am addicted to open-source.
>
> Bruce
thx bruce, but I am addicted to open-source.
Bruce Robertson schrieb:
> You might try Filemaker. That's what is was designed for. Make
> everything so easy.
>
> On Oct 21, 2009, at 8:10 AM, Jan wrote:
>
>> Thank you John. Seems postgres might be a better choice. Although it
>> is
>> so nice
Thank you John. Seems postgres might be a better choice. Although it is
so nice to work with sqlite cause non of this user/administration "crap"
is necessary.
John Elrick schrieb:
> Jan wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Although I read in a recent post by drh that it is not recommended to
>> use sqlite in a
Jan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Although I read in a recent post by drh that it is not recommended to
> use sqlite in a local network I would like to ask if the following
> approach would work:
>
> A database in the local network needs to be accessed by about 20 people.
> I suppose the max. number at the
Pavel Ivanov schrieb:
I'm not sure you want to do that.
No, actually not. Thanks for clarification.
jan
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
Disregarding network drive issue "PRAGMA locking_mode=EXCLUSIVE" means
that once your writer requires PENDING or EXCLUSIVE lock nobody else
will be able to read the database anymore until writer closes
connection to it. In other words without this pragma with relatively
small transactions in
Hi,
Although I read in a recent post by drh that it is not recommended to
use sqlite in a local network I would like to ask if the following
approach would work:
A database in the local network needs to be accessed by about 20 people.
I suppose the max. number at the same time will be 4-5.
8 matches
Mail list logo
