Thanks Igor I used your solution and it work. Char* was the problem. I'll use
strings from now on .
Stephen
Igor Mironchick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think problem is in use char * as parameter in push function. For that
reason I use std::string always.
Look, in callback2 SQLite pas
Sqlite has a feature where you can contanenate SQL statements and
prepare and step them in a loop. Prepare returns a pointer to the start
of the next statement.
The basic prepare/step/reset activity requires that there be a loop to
handle multiple rows, busy returns and possible errors.
Ste
Stephen Sutherland wrote:
okay i'm trying to use preparestatement and step and finalize.
I have some quick questions about this legacy.c code.
First I notice that it has a while loop within a while loop.
Question: when I implement this prepared statement, will I also need a while loo
Hi, guys.
Dennis Cote wrote:
Stephen,
You should look into using the newer prepare/step API functions
instead of the callback mechanism. It will make your code clearer, and
will probably execute faster as well.
I don't think so. Prepare/step mechanism can invoke productivity of
"INSERT" or
I think problem is in use char * as parameter in push function. For that
reason I use std::string always.
Look, in callback2 SQLite pass char ** - array of char*. But when your
code leave callback2 SQLite might errase that array and then all char*
will garbage. But when in push method you will p
okay i'm trying to use preparestatement and step and finalize.
I have some quick questions about this legacy.c code.
First I notice that it has a while loop within a while loop.
Question: when I implement this prepared statement, will I also need a while
loop within a while loop ?
Igor I tried your solution and can't get it working .
Here is my code.
The STRANGE problem that I am having is that when it adds to the vector at
position 1, the vector contains the object.
But when it adds to vector at position 2 using push_back - for some reason
the contents at
Thanks I guess i have to figure out how to use prepared statements instead of
callbacks because i can't get callbacks working as expected.
Dennis Cote <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Stephen Sutherland wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am using the 'quick start' C-styled code for sqlite3
> http://www.sql
Stephen Sutherland wrote:
Hi
I am using the 'quick start' C-styled code for sqlite3 http://www.sqlite.org/quickstart.html
I think I'm running into a problem trying to put it in classes to make it somewhat object oriented. So I'm asking for help about how to make it object-oriented - or to
ord7< Field0, Field1, Field2, FieldN >
Lee Crain
__
-Original Message-
From: Lee Crain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2007 1:45 PM
To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org
Subject: RE: [sqlite] Object Oriented Question About Adding a vector
inside the callback function
St
urce code will not.
I hope this helps,
Lee Crain
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Sutherland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2007 1:06 PM
To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org
Subject: [sqlite] Object Oriented Question About Adding a vector inside
the callback function
Hi
If I understand you right then try it:
static int add_value( void *st, int, char **value, char ** )
{
storage_t * storage = (storage_t*) st;
st->push( value[ 0 ] );
return SQLITE_OK;
};
class storage_t {
public:
storage_t()
:m_db( 0 )
{
sqlite3_open( "your_databa
Hi
I am using the 'quick start' C-styled code for sqlite3
http://www.sqlite.org/quickstart.html
I think I'm running into a problem trying to put it in classes to make it
somewhat object oriented. So I'm asking for help about how to make it
object-oriented - or to confirm whether what I'
13 matches
Mail list logo
