Igor Tandetnik wrote:
John Stanton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Predictability is ensured by using transactions. By using BEGIN and
COMMIT to make transactions atomic you enforce a predictable state.
Not if you modify the same data you are iterating over, on the same DB
connection and thus
John Stanton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Predictability is ensured by using transactions. By using BEGIN and
COMMIT to make transactions atomic you enforce a predictable state.
Not if you modify the same data you are iterating over, on the same DB
connection and thus within the same
Igor Tandetnik wrote:
B V, Phanisekhar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Why it's unpredictable?
Why can't the unpredictable be made predictable?
Please feel free to submit a patch, if you believe it's that easy.
Assume I update the column of a row that meets the criteria of some
select stmt
B V, Phanisekhar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Why it's unpredictable?
Why can't the unpredictable be made predictable?
Please feel free to submit a patch, if you believe it's that easy.
Assume I update the column of a row that meets the criteria of some
select stmt and I am yet to encounter
4 matches
Mail list logo
