Hi Gilles,
On 6/20/07, Gilles Ganault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
At 16:49 19/06/2007 -0700, Medi Montaseri wrote:
The context is that, until now, our apps were almost used on stand-alone
hosts with only a few customers hosting the (small) SQLite database file on
a shared drive on the LAN, so
Gilles Ganault wrote:
At 20:47 19/06/2007 -0500, John Stanton wrote:
Such a server can be made simpler then mine by making it single threaded.
Is it publicly available from http://www.viacognis.com?
Thanks
G.
No, but I can give you some code which might help your project.
The components
At 20:47 19/06/2007 -0500, John Stanton wrote:
Such a server can be made simpler then mine by making it single threaded.
Is it publicly available from http://www.viacognis.com?
Thanks
G.
-
To unsubscribe, send email
Gilles Ganault wrote:
At 11:20 19/06/2007 -0400, Clay Dowling
wrote:
I'm going to recommend PostgreSQL.
Thanks for the idea, but if possible, we'd rather something really
basic, typically a single EXE. Besides, using eg. PostgreSQL would
require rewriting our application.
I went
At 16:49 19/06/2007 -0700, Medi Montaseri wrote:
While its difficult to tell what the problem statement (or context) is,
but the ingrediants like HTTP and POST spells SOAP.
The context is that, until now, our apps were almost used on stand-alone
hosts with only a few customers hosting the
While its difficult to tell what the problem statement (or context) is,
but the ingrediants like HTTP and POST spells SOAP.
-Original Message-
From: Gilles Ganault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2007 4:32 PM
To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org
Subject: Re: [sqlite] Recommend
At 11:20 19/06/2007 -0400, Clay Dowling
wrote:
I'm going to recommend PostgreSQL.
Thanks for the idea, but if possible, we'd rather something really basic,
typically a single EXE. Besides, using eg. PostgreSQL would require
rewriting our application.
I went through the list of servers on
Gilles Ganault wrote:
> We'd really like to stick to SQLite because it's very easy to set up, and
> most of our customers don't have anyone technical around to help them set
> up a DBMS server.
I'm going to recommend PostgreSQL. It's very easy to install from your
application's installer and
Hello
Until now, our users were mostly single-hosts, and the few who did share
an SQLite database through a shared drive had a small database and very low
concurrency. But a couple of new ones have a DB that's about 50MB, running
on a 10Mbps LAN... and an INSERT takes about 10 seconds :-/
9 matches
Mail list logo
