Hello !
Comparing the three systems tested:
raspibian raspberry pi3: 53us
linux celeron: 12us
os x i5: 7.7us
One thing that I was expecting is that when using all core/threads (and
because basically all data in in memory/cache) that I'll have around 100% cpu
load but I don't, so ther
Hello !
Here is the same tests on a raspberry pi3:
raspberry pi3 memory database 1 thread:
Update rate: total=214229, last_total=194712, rate=19517, avg1=19517,
avg2=19475
Update busy rate: total=0, last_total=0, rate=0, avg1=0, avg2=0
Update failed rate: total=0, last_total=0, rate=0, avg
On 25 Mar 2016, at 6:21pm, Domingo Alvarez Duarte wrote:
> One thing that I was expecting is that when using all core/threads (and
> because basically all data in in memory/cache) that I'll have around 100% cpu
> load but I don't, so there is something that is preventing usage of all
> system re
Hello !
I modified a bit the program to somehow test sqlite/system performance at
https://gist.github.com/mingodad/79225c88f8dce0f174f5 ,
now we can also specify a memory database and doing so on a mac mini i5 2/4
cores surprisingly memory database when shared with 4 threads is slower than
di
4 matches
Mail list logo