On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 3:19 PM, Richard Hipp wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 4:15 PM, P Kishor wrote:
>
>>
>> Right then. That explains #3 above. Are you saying that #5 is
>> available for a fee? And, is there a description of #5 and how it
>> differs from #4? Not that I will understand the dif
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 4:15 PM, P Kishor wrote:
>
> Right then. That explains #3 above. Are you saying that #5 is
> available for a fee? And, is there a description of #5 and how it
> differs from #4? Not that I will understand the differences, nor will
> I ever need it. I just didn't realize #5
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 3:04 PM, Richard Hipp wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 3:58 PM, P Kishor wrote:
>
>> I am simply curious, and want to expand my knowledge of this --
>>
>> 1. sqlite3 code is in public domain.
>> 2. sqlite mark is trademarked.
>> 3. sqlite3 encryption extension is licensed
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 3:58 PM, P Kishor wrote:
> I am simply curious, and want to expand my knowledge of this --
>
> 1. sqlite3 code is in public domain.
> 2. sqlite mark is trademarked.
> 3. sqlite3 encryption extension is licensed and for a fee, and comes
> with a contract to not distribute i
I am simply curious, and want to expand my knowledge of this --
1. sqlite3 code is in public domain.
2. sqlite mark is trademarked.
3. sqlite3 encryption extension is licensed and for a fee, and comes
with a contract to not distribute it further.
4. sqlite code tests are available as long as they
5 matches
Mail list logo