On Sun, 2005-02-27 at 15:31 -0500, Clay Dowling wrote:
> >
> >Anyone using other compiler to build sqlite on Windows ? Maybe Borland ?
> >I seems there is a lot o room for faster sqlite.dll by using other
> >compiers than VC++ 6. We can run some tests to see which is faster ...
> >
> I thought I
Ionut Filip wrote:
Hi,
So the VC++ 7.1 dll is much faster than the VC++ 6, up to 20% in some
operations, and the "MS mixed dll load bug" is not a problem, assuming
sqlite doesn't mix native code with managed .net code :).
Anyone using other compiler to build sqlite on Windows ? Maybe Borland ?
I
ith Herold'
Subject: RE: [sqlite] sqlite performance variationin linux and windows
> -Original Message-
> From: Keith Herold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, February 25, 2005 3:57 PM
> To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org
> Subject: Re: [sqlite] sqlite performance variationin li
build a version up to 10-15% faster
I saw the same kind of speedup (and sometimes up to 25%) depending on
if assertions are enabled. I believe they are enabled by default.
Adding -DNDEBUG turns them off.
Roger
http://www.adtmag.com/article.asp?id=7421
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dv_vstechart/html/vcconMixedDLLLoadingProblem.asp
It's been awhile since Iooked at this, but I distinctly remember
reading from one of the product managers at MS that this wouldn't be
fixed
, February 25, 2005 2:05 PM
To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [sqlite] Re: sqlite performance variationin linux and windows
Hi Chris,
Thanks for the detailed explanation,
I will dig deeper into my code to see if there is anything wrong in the OS
specific code in my appln.
Hi,
Neelamegam Appadurai wrote:
Can anyone please help me how to increase the performance on windows
enviroment
One thing you can do is to increase the page size from 1024 to 4096.
That seems to match either Windows' swapfile-pagesize or the default
page size of NTFS (there is disagreement
7 matches
Mail list logo