On Sun, 2 Feb 2020 10:05:11 +0100
Markus Winand wrote:
> When you say ?many standards? do you mean the different releases
> those standards have?
Yes.
> IMHO, there is only one SQL standard, namely ISO/IEC 9075. The
> current and technically only valid version is that of 2016 (even
> though
> On 1 Feb 2020, at 23:31, James K. Lowden wrote:
>
> Similarly, last I checked, no SQL standard supported LIMIT for SELECT.
Just FYI:
The the functionality of LIMIT was added to the SQL standard ISO/IEC 9075 with
the 2008 update in form of
FETCH FIRST … ROWS ONLY
This clause also
On Thu, 30 Jan 2020 19:19:53 +
Simon Slavin wrote:
> Have any of you been using this term for a meaning other than "Fully
> conforming to SQL:2019 (or whatever version you think current) ? Do
> you have documentation somewhere ? Or are my suspicions correct and
> there's no such thing ?
I
> On 30 Jan 2020, at 21:12, Keith Medcalf wrote:
>
> On Thursday, 30 January, 2020 12:20, Simon Slavin
> wrote:
>
>> I would appreciate your help. Reading a technical article today, I came
>> across a casual reference to "Standard SQL" as if it was a well-known
>> thing. This worried me
On Thursday, 30 January, 2020 12:20, Simon Slavin wrote:
>I would appreciate your help. Reading a technical article today, I came
>across a casual reference to "Standard SQL" as if it was a well-known
>thing. This worried me since I've never heard the term and I'm meant to
>know about such
A few resources I found from https://www.google.com/search?q=sql+standard :
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SQL
-
https://blog.ansi.org/2018/10/sql-standard-iso-iec-9075-2016-ansi-x3-135/#gref
- https://dev.to/0xcrypto/who-owns-the-sql-standard-76m
-
6 matches
Mail list logo
