On Thu, 20 Sep 2007 10:14:10 -0700 drh wrote:
> Sqlite3_open_v2() and SQLITE_OPEN_READONLY and a whole bunch
> of other stuff is all new to 3.5.0. Version 3.5.0 is stable.
> It has lots of cool stuff. Older versions are not supported
> (except for paying customers) - by which we mean that if any
No, I meant like in http://sqlite.org/capi3ref.html#sqlite3_open,
adding a small logo or box "new in 3.5.0" adjacent to the description
of _v2. Then it is clear what version(s) support the feature.
On 9/20/07, Kees Nuyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 20 Sep 2007 13:57:58 -0400, Liam wrot
On Thu, 20 Sep 2007 13:57:58 -0400, Liam wrote:
> It would be nice if the documentation gave a
> brief indication when a feature is added
> ("new in 3.5.0" unobtrusively somewhere).
Like in http://www.sqlite.org/34to35.html ?
--
( Kees Nuyt
)
c[_]
-
OK thanks, I'll upgrade when it hits Debian unstable which I expect
will be fairly soon. It would be nice if the documentation gave a
brief indication when a feature is added ("new in 3.5.0" unobtrusively
somewhere).
Liam
On 9/20/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Liam Healy" <[
RaghavendraK 70574 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is the performance same,better or
>
Perhaps a little better for some special cases.
Otherwise about the same.
--
D. Richard Hipp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To uns
email immediately and
delete it!
*
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thursday, September 20, 2007 10:40 pm
Subject: Re: [sqlite] sqlite3_open_v2 and SQLITE_OPEN_READONLY
> &q
"Liam Healy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I tried to use sqlite3_open_v2 and SQLITE_OPEN_READONLY as described in
> http://sqlite.org/capi3ref.html#sqlite3_open, but the symbol
> SQLITE_OPEN_READONLY is unknown, even though I have included
> sqlite3.h. I am using version 3.4.2. Was this symbol no
7 matches
Mail list logo
