RE: [sqlite] retrieving data from multiple tables

I have four tables like Mytable1,Mytable2,Mytable3,Mytable4 Mytable1 and Mytable2 have one similar field rest al different, Mytable2 and Mytable3 have one similar field rest al different, Mytable3 and Mytable4 have one similar field rest al different, i have to select from four tables by matching

Re: [sqlite] retrieving data from multiple tables

Hi Kirrthana, I have created a database with four tables,i have to search and retrieve data from all the four tables based on the entry i get from the previous table and display all the entries,could anybody tell how to do it. I'm not sure what you mean. If you mean you have four table

[sqlite] retrieving data from multiple tables

Hi all, I have created a database with four tables,i have to search and retrieve data from all the four tables based on the entry i get from the previous table and display all the entries,could anybody tell how to do it. Regards Kirrthana

[sqlite] Does anybody can port sqlite3-3.3.7 to uClinux based-ARModulator?

Hi guys uClinux version with 2003. kernel with linux-2.4.x. sqlite with 3.3.7 verdor with GDB. productor with ARModulator. compilied process work out as well. "illegal write to 0x54fd0 of 0x11affb4" I received. [EMAIL PROTECTED] uClinux-dist-2003]# arm-elf-gdb linux-2.4.x/linux

Re: [sqlite] Pragma table_info(), why no fields like UNIQUE, AUTOINCREMENT

Hi, - Original Message - From: "Stef Mientki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2007 3:47 PM Subject: Re: [sqlite] Pragma table_info(), why no fields like UNIQUE, AUTOINCREMENT > > > > > > You should also consider how your change might effect > > backwards compatibility.

Re: [sqlite] MingW32 help wanted

Scott Hess wrote: I took Makefile.linux-gcc, and made the obvious changes (there are mingw lines all over in there). EXE = .exe, SO =dll, SHPREFIX = , [that was nothing for that setting], and TCC, AR, and RANLIB set to the path to the appropriate commands from mingw. I should warn that I haven'

Re: [sqlite] MingW32 help wanted

I took Makefile.linux-gcc, and made the obvious changes (there are mingw lines all over in there). EXE = .exe, SO =dll, SHPREFIX = , [that was nothing for that setting], and TCC, AR, and RANLIB set to the path to the appropriate commands from mingw. I should warn that I haven't actually built us

Re: [sqlite] MingW32 help wanted

Mike Frysinger wrote: On Tuesday 13 March 2007, Stefan de Konink wrote: My target is to get sqlite compiled on my host platform i686 and my target platform mingw32. Could someone get a step by step manual to get the 'precious' dll/.a? well, this could be autotoolized and force people to do ./c

Re: [sqlite] MingW32 help wanted

On Tuesday 13 March 2007, Stefan de Konink wrote: > My target is to get sqlite compiled on my host platform i686 and my > target platform mingw32. Could someone get a step by step manual to get > the 'precious' dll/.a? well, this could be autotoolized and force people to do ./configure --host=ming

[sqlite] MingW32 help wanted

Hello, I have found this post: http://marc.10east.com/?l=sqlite-users&m=115689163614925&w=2 My target is to get sqlite compiled on my host platform i686 and my target platform mingw32. Could someone get a step by step manual to get the 'precious' dll/.a? When removing the os_unix.c from t

Re: [sqlite] Degrouping, desummarizing or integrating headings

Thanks Puneet for your response. this is a programming problem and not necessarily a SQLite problem. Well, I can program it, but hope that instead there's a way to do it within SQL. Nevertheless, you don't specify how you are getting this summary data... are they in a database? are they

Re: [sqlite] FTS: index only, no text storage - Was: [sqlite] FTS: Custom Tokenizer / Stop Words

On 3/13/07, Ralf Junker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Scott Hess wrote: >Keeping track of that information would probably double the >size of the index. With your estimate, the SQLite full text index (without document storage) would still take up only 50% of the documents' size. In my opinion, this

Re: [sqlite] FTS: index only, no text storage - Was: [sqlite] FTS: Custom Tokenizer / Stop Words

Hello Scott, I was hoping that you would read my message, many thanks for your reply! >UPDATE and DELETE need to have the previous document text, because the >docids are embedded in the index, and there is no docid->term index >(or, put another way, the previous document text _is_ the docid->term

Re: [sqlite] FTS: index only, no text storage - Was: [sqlite] FTS: Custom Tokenizer / Stop Words

Ion Silvestru wrote: >Just a question: did you eliminated stop-words in your tests? No, I did not eliminate any stop-words. The two test runs were equal except for the small changes in FTS 2. My stop words question was not intended for source code but for human language texts. Ralf --

Re: [sqlite] Pragma table_info(), why no fields like UNIQUE, AUTOINCREMENT

You should also consider how your change might effect backwards compatibility. The last time that table_info() was modified, the Ruby-On-Rails community got really upset. I'm rather of a mind to leave table_info() alone. Forgive my ignorance, I'm just a beginner in databases, but what abou

[sqlite] LEMON question

I want to know if I can here public some LEMON PARSER examples that I have done... because as i far i know LEMON is maintained into SQLite project. Best Regards -- Cesar Rodas http://www.cesarodas.com/ Mobile Phone: 595 961 974165 Phone: 595 21 645590 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [sqlite] date/time implementation question

Rafi Cohen wrote: Hi, I hope this question is not off-topic for this list. I'm recieveing, occasionally, a .csv file from a source which I need to process accordcing to some criteria and either insert, delet or update it's rows into a database. One of it's criterias is date comparison. In other w

[sqlite] date/time implementation question

Hi, I hope this question is not off-topic for this list. I'm recieveing, occasionally, a .csv file from a source which I need to process accordcing to some criteria and either insert, delet or update it's rows into a database. One of it's criterias is date comparison. In other words, proceeding dif

Re: [sqlite] Pragma table_info(), why no fields like UNIQUE, AUTOINCREMENT

"Vivien Malerba" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 3/13/07, Martin Jenkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Vivien Malerba wrote: > > > I've already sent a proposal along with a patch some time ago about > > > that, but nobody seemed to care, see > > > http://www.mail-archive.com/sqlite-users@sqlite.or

Re: [sqlite] FTS: index only, no text storage - Was: [sqlite] FTS: Custom Tokenizer / Stop Words

On 3/13/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Ion Silvestru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > To Ralf: > >As a side effect, the offsets() and snippet() functions stopped working, > >as they seem to rely on the presence of the full document text in the > >current implementation. > > Did you

Re: [sqlite] Degrouping, desummarizing or integrating headings

On 3/13/07, T&B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi All, I come across a fair bit of source data in summary format, where the one field's values are used as a heading for a group of records for which it applies. For instance, this shopping list: Aisle Product Cost Dairy Milk

Re: [sqlite] Pragma table_info(), why no fields like UNIQUE, AUTOINCREMENT

On 3/13/07, Martin Jenkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Vivien Malerba wrote: > I've already sent a proposal along with a patch some time ago about > that, but nobody seemed to care, see > http://www.mail-archive.com/sqlite-users@sqlite.org/msg21285.html Vivien, I can't see any patch attached to t

[sqlite] Degrouping, desummarizing or integrating headings

Hi All, I come across a fair bit of source data in summary format, where the one field's values are used as a heading for a group of records for which it applies. For instance, this shopping list: Aisle Product Cost Dairy Milk $2 Cream$1

Re: [sqlite] SQLite v/s SQLite3 Performance Assay

Hi Doug, My bad... the getTickCount() in the snippet is basically a wrapper over ftime call, and the same is used on the linux platform also for timing. time_t getTickCount() { timeb tm = {0}; ftime(&tm); return ( (tm.time*1000) + ((time_t)tm.millitm) ); } Thanks & Regards Nitin

Re: [sqlite] SQLite v/s SQLite3 Performance Assay

"Nitin Kashyap" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > My Intentions are towards exploring the reason behind these differences; > and what can be done to counter these performance differences. I'm > seeking some pointers from the Community. > I use SQLite for a lot of different things (as you would exp

Re: [sqlite] Pragma table_info(), why no fields like UNIQUE, AUTOINCREMENT

Vivien Malerba wrote: I've already sent a proposal along with a patch some time ago about that, but nobody seemed to care, see http://www.mail-archive.com/sqlite-users@sqlite.org/msg21285.html Vivien, This mailing list does not pass attachments. A patch such as your is best handled by subm

Re: [sqlite] FTS: index only, no text storage - Was: [sqlite] FTS: Custom Tokenizer / Stop Words

Ion Silvestru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > To Ralf: > > >As a side effect, the offsets() and snippet() functions stopped working, as > >they seem to rely on the presence of the full document text in the current > >implementation. > > Did you tested "phrase" searching on the index-only version,

RE: [sqlite] SQLite v/s SQLite3 Performance Assay

Be aware that the Windows GetTickCount call has a resolution of 10 to 15 ms on most machines, so that could throw throw your timings off if you're timing each individual test case as it appears below. To get better timer resolution, use QueryPerformanceCounter. Now, would that make SQLite3 looks

Re: [sqlite] FTS: index only, no text storage - Was: [sqlite] FTS: Custom Tokenizer / Stop Words

To Ralf: >As a side effect, the offsets() and snippet() functions stopped working, as >they seem to rely on the presence of the full document text in the current >implementation. Did you tested "phrase" searching on the index-only version, didn't this kind of search rely on offsets()? ---

Re[2]: [sqlite] FTS: index only, no text storage - Was: [sqlite] FTS: Custom Tokenizer / Stop Words

>Just a question: did you eliminated stop-words in your tests? Sorry, you specified that you indexed source code files, so no stop-words are applicable here. - To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---

Re: [sqlite] FTS: index only, no text storage - Was: [sqlite] FTS: Custom Tokenizer / Stop Words

Thank you. Just a question: did you eliminated stop-words in your tests? >Concluding: Given the great database size savings possible by separating full >text index from data storage, I wish that >developers would consider adding such an option to the SQLite FTS interface. If such an option wil

[sqlite] FTS: index only, no text storage - Was: [sqlite] FTS: Custom Tokenizer / Stop Words

>But what about: > >I am very interested to know if it would be possible to use an FTS indexing >module to store the inverted index only, but >not the document's text. This would safe disk space if the text to index is >stored on disk rather than inside the database. This is possible with just

Re: [sqlite] Pragma table_info(), why no fields like UNIQUE, AUTOINCREMENT

Vivien Malerba wrote: I've already sent a proposal along with a patch some time ago about that, but nobody seemed to care, see http://www.mail-archive.com/sqlite-users@sqlite.org/msg21285.html Vivien, I can't see any patch attached to that post. Perhaps you should resubmit it? And I'll guess t

Re: [sqlite] Pragma table_info(), why no fields like UNIQUE, AUTOINCREMENT

On 3/12/07, Stef Mientki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: If ask the table sturcture, with pragma table_info() I get of course the basic fields, like: CID,Name,Type, And also SOME special values, like Null, DefaultValue, PrimaryKey But NOT the following special values (and probably a lot more)