Sorry...That's what I meant - scary you can insert into a table that has
this property without first setting The propert off without re-seeding -
ie. How Sybase and SqlServer handle this..
It would be good if this was documented a little clearer
Thx all for your assistance - onward and upwa
rayB wrote:
Seems that dot-commands (.output, .separator, .nullvalue, etc) are now being
rejected by SQLite.exe 2.8.13 when contained in files executed via the .read
command.
Error message text is: ‘unknown command or invalid arguments: "output".
Enter ".help" for help’
I tired it and everythi
On Mar 8, 2004, at 5:09 PM, Tito Ciuro wrote:
You can write your own sqlite_get_table to package up all the types
for you.
I'd like to do that. Should I create my own TabResult struct, to store
the column data or would I be doing too much work? Any pointers?
I would see if you can't snarf the s
Tito Ciuro wrote:
If I understand correctly, I should write my own sqlite_get_table()
function with a custom callback which stores the column data somewhere,
right? Would it be better to create my own TabResult struct, to store
the column data or would I be doing too much work?
The other thing
Hello,
On 8 mar 2004, at 18:57, Will Leshner wrote:
Are you seeing these results with the callback or with
sqlite_get_table. I'm betting sqlite_get_table, because the callback
doesn't return results in that fashion. Anyway, you can't get the
types with sqlite_get_table. Only with the callback.
Hello,
On 8 mar 2004, at 18:47, Dennis Cote wrote:
How are you interfacing to SQLite? Are you using the C API directly?
If so,
are you using sqlite_exec() with a callback function (the callback
API), or
are you using the sqlite_compile(), sqlite_step(), and
sqlite_finalize()
(the newer non-cal
- Forwarded by Ben Carlyle/AU/IRSA/Rail on 09/03/2004 10:56 AM -
Ben Carlyle
09/03/2004 10:54 AM
To: "Roger Hawkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@CORP
cc:
Subject:RE: [sqlite] Resetting primary key auto-increment after table
re-create
Roger,
"Roger Haw
Seems that dot-commands (.output, .separator, .nullvalue, etc) are now being
rejected by SQLite.exe 2.8.13 when contained in files executed via the .read
command.
Error message text is: unknown command or invalid arguments: "output".
Enter ".help" for help
Was this change intended?
Regards
Will Leshner wrote:
Anyway, you can't get the types with
sqlite_get_table. Only with the callback.
Sorry for the misleading information. By "only with the callback" I meant considering those two options, the callback is the only one of them that returns types. You can also create a VM out of your
Tito Ciuro wrote:
Hello,
After reading quite a bit about 'show_datatypes' I still don't get its
workings.
After setting 'PRAGMA show_datatypes = ON;' I go ahead and perform a
'SELECT * FROM address_table LIMIT 1;' The resulting set contains 4
columns, 1 row:
[0] --> ROWID
[1] --> First
[2] --
From: "Tito Ciuro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Now that 2.8.13 is out, is 'PRAGMA show_datatypes = ON' by default? I
> wonder because I'm still not getting the data types in the result set.
>
> I posted a message yesterday and after upgrading to 2.8.13 I'm still
> getting the same results. Can someone *p
At 8:16 AM +1100 3/9/04, Greg Obleshchuk wrote:
Hi ,
I have an appllication for MS SQL Server which creates crosstab reports .
To generate some extra speed out of the process I use SQLite (funning I
think) as an in memory database. Has there been any improvements in speed
or stability of the :memo
Hello guys,
Now that 2.8.13 is out, is 'PRAGMA show_datatypes = ON' by default? I
wonder because I'm still not getting the data types in the result set.
I posted a message yesterday and after upgrading to 2.8.13 I'm still
getting the same results. Can someone *please* give me some pointers?
Th
Hi ,
I have an appllication for MS SQL Server which creates crosstab reports .
To generate some extra speed out of the process I use SQLite (funning I
think) as an in memory database. Has there been any improvements in speed
or stability of the :memory: database since 2.8.9? I just want to know if
> So what you are saying is that if I recreate the table I can insert all
> the old values back into the newly created table (including the primary
> key values) and the primary key column wont complain? That's a bit
> scary!
It's not scary, it's essential. In a real database, an integer
primary
Ralph Wetzel wrote:
Wouldn't it be a nice idea to rollout 2.8.13, so that it reduces the amount
of flood (on this list and the wiki) concerning already fixed bugs???
Version 2.8.13 is now on the website.
--
D. Richard Hipp -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- 704.948.4565
--
16 matches
Mail list logo