>
> Well, it's supported by most compilers today, but I try to avoid
> anonymous unions in C code as well. They are fairly standard for C++,
> but not for C. But the approach seems fine to me - the alignment will
> be forced in this case.
>
Just to make it clear: can I expect this fix in the next
> Is there another way to get the column schema besides parsing the original
> CREATE TABLE command?
>
> thx
> -Brett G.
>
>
> This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
Hello Brett
You can access the
Brett Goodman wrote:
Is there another way to get the column schema besides parsing the original
CREATE TABLE command?
Sure, sqlite3_table_column_metadata, see
http://sqlite.org/capi3ref.html#sqlite3_table_column_metadata
This routine is used to obtain meta information about a specific
Hello everybody,
On 26/03/2006, at 10:08, John Stanton wrote:
LIKE and GLOB do a row scan, and give you none of the advantages of
an RDBMS. Why not use a flat file and grep and get simplicity and
greater speed?
I'm very well aware that LIKE and GLOB perform a row scan. I do
appreciate
Is there another way to get the column schema besides parsing the original
CREATE TABLE command?
thx
-Brett G.
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
John Stanton wrote:
Tito Ciuro wrote:
On 26/03/2006, at 10:51, MGC wrote:
Your design is fundamentaly wrong.
I don't know what your intended use
is for this data, but I am logging identical fstat file info along
with an
MD5 sums.
Well... if you don't know what is the intended use for
Tito Ciuro wrote:
On 26/03/2006, at 10:51, MGC wrote:
Your design is fundamentaly wrong.
I don't know what your intended use
is for this data, but I am logging identical fstat file info along
with an
MD5 sums.
Well... if you don't know what is the intended use for the data, how
can you
On 3/26/06, Igor Tandetnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nemanja Corlija <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have a following query:
> > SELECT date FROM chng ORDER BY -date;
> >
> > Is there a way to use positional argument (hopefully that's the right
> > term) instead of column name here?
> >
Nemanja Corlija <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have a following query:
SELECT date FROM chng ORDER BY -date;
Is there a way to use positional argument (hopefully that's the right
term) instead of column name here?
Something like this:
SELECT date FROM chng ORDER BY -1;
select date, -date from
On 26/03/2006, at 10:51, MGC wrote:
Your design is fundamentaly wrong.
I don't know what your intended use
is for this data, but I am logging identical fstat file info along
with an
MD5 sums.
Well... if you don't know what is the intended use for the data, how
can you say that my design
I have a following query:
SELECT date FROM chng ORDER BY -date;
Is there a way to use positional argument (hopefully that's the right
term) instead of column name here?
Something like this:
SELECT date FROM chng ORDER BY -1;
This fails with a message "ORDER BY column number -1 out of range -
There may be an issue, but.
Your design is fundamentaly wrong.
I don't know what your intended use
is for this data, but I am logging identical fstat file info along with an
MD5 sums.
Each informational element needs
to be stored in an individual column.
Stuffing all those fields into a
Hello,
I've populated a datafile with 40.176 records which contain file
attributes and file paths. I have two columns, CMKey and CMValues.
The column CMKey contains the path to the file and the column
CMValues contains the attribute values. For example:
CMKey: Application
13 matches
Mail list logo
