On 2/4/2014 6:43 PM, Yuriy Kaminskiy wrote:
I've checked on 3.8.2, 3.8.1, 3.7.14, 3.7.7; results was exactly same. I've
added sqlite3_libversion() output, and it matches expected version in all cases.
This is on linux/i386/32-bit.
Well, 3.5.9 on Windows 7 works to spec. That's all I know.
You
Igor Tandetnik wrote:
> On 2/4/2014 5:51 PM, Yuriy Kaminskiy wrote:
>> Igor Tandetnik wrote:
>>> On 2/4/2014 11:57 AM, Yuriy Kaminskiy wrote:
Phew. Do you speak C? Enjoy.
printf("insert...\r"); fflush(stdout);
for(i = 0; i < 1000; i++) {
rc = sqlite3_bind_i
On 2/4/2014 5:51 PM, Yuriy Kaminskiy wrote:
Igor Tandetnik wrote:
On 2/4/2014 11:57 AM, Yuriy Kaminskiy wrote:
Phew. Do you speak C? Enjoy.
printf("insert...\r"); fflush(stdout);
for(i = 0; i < 1000; i++) {
rc = sqlite3_bind_int(ins_sth, 1, i);
assert(rc == SQLITE_OK);
On 4 Feb 2014, at 8:49pm, Igor Tandetnik wrote:
> If it is unable to promote the lock, then the in-memory cache will be left in
> an inconsistent state and so the error code is promoted from the relatively
> benign SQLITE_BUSY to the more severe SQLITE_IOERR_BLOCKED. This error code
> promoti
Igor Tandetnik wrote:
> On 2/4/2014 11:57 AM, Yuriy Kaminskiy wrote:
>> Phew. Do you speak C? Enjoy.
>>
>> printf("insert...\r"); fflush(stdout);
>> for(i = 0; i < 1000; i++) {
>> rc = sqlite3_bind_int(ins_sth, 1, i);
>> assert(rc == SQLITE_OK);
>> rc = sqlite3_step(ins_sth);
On 2/4/2014 11:57 AM, Yuriy Kaminskiy wrote:
Phew. Do you speak C? Enjoy.
printf("insert...\r"); fflush(stdout);
for(i = 0; i < 1000; i++) {
rc = sqlite3_bind_int(ins_sth, 1, i);
assert(rc == SQLITE_OK);
rc = sqlite3_step(ins_sth);
assert(rc == SQLITE_DO
If you have any issues with the current code, please report them via this
mailing
list (and/or by creating a ticket on "https://system.data.sqlite.org/";)
prior to
this coming Friday, February 7th.
Thanks.
--
Joe Mistachkin
___
sqlite-users mailing li
Eric Schultz wrote:
>
> The 1.0.91.0 beta you gave me works perfect in my scenario. Thanks so
much!
> Any plan for when the final will be out?
>
The release is currently scheduled for Monday, February 10th (give or take a
day or so).
--
Joe Mistachkin
__
Igor Tandetnik wrote:
> On 2/4/2014 5:23 AM, Yuriy Kaminskiy wrote:
>> How sqlite is supposed to behave when
>> *) there are read-only transaction;
>> *) there are update transaction on other connection;
>> *) cache space is exhausted by update transaction;
>> *) sqlite was not able to upgrade RESE
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 11:34 AM, Stephan Beal wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 2:52 AM, Richard Hipp wrote:
>
> > There is no "intended" behavior.
> > http://www.sqlite.org/c3ref/mark/column_name.html?If+there+is+n*fied
>
>
> i assume the broken image at the top of that page qualifies as "uninten
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 2:52 AM, Richard Hipp wrote:
> There is no "intended" behavior.
> http://www.sqlite.org/c3ref/mark/column_name.html?If+there+is+n*fied
i assume the broken image at the top of that page qualifies as "unintended
behaviour" ;)
http://www.sqlite.org/c3ref/images/sqlite370_ba
Joe,
The 1.0.91.0 beta you gave me works perfect in my scenario. Thanks so much!
Any plan for when the final will be out?
Eric
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 3:12 PM, Joe Mistachkin wrote:
>
> Eric Schultz wrote:
> >
> > I can't seem to build the Interop.SQLite.dll files ("build.bat
> > ReleaseNative
On 2/4/2014 5:23 AM, Yuriy Kaminskiy wrote:
How sqlite is supposed to behave when
*) there are read-only transaction;
*) there are update transaction on other connection;
*) cache space is exhausted by update transaction;
*) sqlite was not able to upgrade RESERVED lock to EXCLUSIVE due to presenc
Igor Tandetnik wrote:
> On 2/3/2014 3:21 PM, Yuriy Kaminskiy wrote:
>> Igor Tandetnik wrote:
>>> On 2/3/2014 1:07 PM, Baruch Burstein wrote:
1) How does a transaction affect SELECTs? If I start a transaction
and do
an UPDATE/DELETE/INSERT, what data will a SELECT in the same
tra
14 matches
Mail list logo
