On Sat, 4 Jun 2016 18:18:36 +0200
skywind mailing lists wrote:
> At the moment I have to run something like:
>
> UPDATE A SET item1=(SELECT B.item FROM B WHERE B.ID=A.ID),...
> itemN=... WHERE EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM B WHERE B.ID=A.ID);
>
> Using a FROM clause I just need one scan through B (at l
On Thu, 26 May 2016 10:54:30 -0400
r.a.n...@gmail.com wrote:
> FWIW, since it's inception, S.Q.L has been pronounced allot like
> CICS.
This may be more true than you know. It's not too hard to find
old-timers who pronounce it "kicks".
--jkl
___
s
One idea I came up with a while ago is to use a trigger on the "FROM"
table to cause updates to the main table:
CREATE TRIGGER UpdateTrigger AFTER UPDATE OF TriggerField ON Updates
BEGIN
UPDATE Master SET
Field1 = OLD.Field1,
Field2 = OLD.Field2,
...
WHERE Master.Ke
On Jun 6, 2016 7:47 PM, "Eric Sink" wrote:
>
> Official, but slightly vague:
>
> https://developer.android.com/preview/behavior-changes.html#ndk
SQLCipher (based on SQLite) has already dealt with this in:
https://github.com/sqlcipher/android-database-sqlcipher/issues/216
I also made a library to
Official, but slightly vague:
https://developer.android.com/preview/behavior-changes.html#ndk
>From Xamarin:
https://developer.xamarin.com/releases/android/xamarin.android_6/xamarin.android_6.0/
--
E
On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 12:40 PM, Jason H wrote:
> > It is my understanding that Android N w
> It is my understanding that Android N will no longer allow apps to use the
> system-installed SQLite library (unless they go through the Android Java
> API, android.database.sqlite).
>
> This is unfortunate, as many existing Android apps do access libsqlite3
> directly and will crash on Android
It is my understanding that Android N will no longer allow apps to use the
system-installed SQLite library (unless they go through the Android Java
API, android.database.sqlite).
This is unfortunate, as many existing Android apps do access libsqlite3
directly and will crash on Android N.
Apps whi
Intro:
The shiftreduce action is a shift action followed by a
reduce action. It is executed in two parts: a shift part,
shifting to an anonymous state. In this state, the state
number is actually an indication of the reduction to perform,
independently of the lookahead symbol.
When performing the
Would not
Replace into A () select ,,
from A [cross] join B on( );
do the trick? If a.rowid has an alias (i.e. integer primary key) then the
modified rows would be deleted, but reinserted with their respective previous
rowids. This may required switching foreign keys off fort he duration of t
9 matches
Mail list logo